The Effect of Health Insurance on Pediatric Cancer Survival: An Analysis of Children Evaluated for Radiation Therapy

Jessica R Fine1, Justine M Ransdell1, Paulo S Pinheiro2,3

  • 1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

Insights

Children with Medicaid/Medicare insurance had worse cancer survival outcomes. This study highlights disparities in pediatric radiation oncology care, emphasizing the need for equitable insurance coverage for better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Health Services Research
  • Radiation Oncology

Background:

  • Health insurance plays a crucial role in cancer survival, particularly in diverse pediatric populations undergoing radiation therapy.
  • Identifying patients at risk of adverse outcomes is essential for improving care in pediatric radiation oncology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of health insurance type on cancer survival among pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy.
  • To identify potential disparities in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on insurance status.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from 459 pediatric patients (<19 years) diagnosed between 1990 and 2019, evaluated for radiation therapy.
  • Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze predictors of RFS and OS, including health insurance, diagnosis type, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
  • Key variables included private pay insurance versus Medicaid/Medicare.

Main Results:

  • Patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance showed significantly lower 5-year RFS (36.5%) and OS (71.0%) compared to privately insured patients (59.8% RFS, 87.5% OS).
  • Multivariable analysis revealed that Medicaid/Medicare patients had a 54% higher risk of recurrence and a 79% higher risk of death.
  • These disparities persisted even after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors.

Conclusions:

  • Pediatric radiation oncology patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance face significant disadvantages in both recurrence-free survival and overall survival.
  • Insurance status is a critical factor influencing outcomes in pediatric cancer care, independent of other clinical and demographic variables.
  • Findings underscore the need to address insurance-related barriers to optimize cancer care and survival for all pediatric patients.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
402
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
228
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
168
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
150
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.4K