Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
The Effect of Health Insurance on Pediatric Cancer Survival: An Analysis of Children Evaluated for Radiation Therapy
Jessica R Fine1, Justine M Ransdell1, Paulo S Pinheiro2,3
1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
Insights
Children with Medicaid/Medicare insurance had worse cancer survival outcomes. This study highlights disparities in pediatric radiation oncology care, emphasizing the need for equitable insurance coverage for better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Health Services Research
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Health insurance plays a crucial role in cancer survival, particularly in diverse pediatric populations undergoing radiation therapy.
- Identifying patients at risk of adverse outcomes is essential for improving care in pediatric radiation oncology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of health insurance type on cancer survival among pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy.
- To identify potential disparities in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) based on insurance status.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 459 pediatric patients (<19 years) diagnosed between 1990 and 2019, evaluated for radiation therapy.
- Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze predictors of RFS and OS, including health insurance, diagnosis type, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
- Key variables included private pay insurance versus Medicaid/Medicare.
Main Results:
- Patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance showed significantly lower 5-year RFS (36.5%) and OS (71.0%) compared to privately insured patients (59.8% RFS, 87.5% OS).
- Multivariable analysis revealed that Medicaid/Medicare patients had a 54% higher risk of recurrence and a 79% higher risk of death.
- These disparities persisted even after adjusting for clinical and demographic factors.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric radiation oncology patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance face significant disadvantages in both recurrence-free survival and overall survival.
- Insurance status is a critical factor influencing outcomes in pediatric cancer care, independent of other clinical and demographic variables.
- Findings underscore the need to address insurance-related barriers to optimize cancer care and survival for all pediatric patients.
Background:
Understanding the role of health insurance in cancer survival in a diverse population of pediatric radiation oncology patients could help to identify patients at risk of adverse outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
Data were collected from cancer patients evaluated for radiation therapy, age < 19, diagnosed from January 1990 to August 2019. Predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. Variables included health insurance, diagnosis type, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status deprivation index.
Results:
The study included 459 patients with a median diagnosis age of 9 years. Demographic breakdown was 49.5% Hispanic, 27.2% non-Hispanic White, and 20.7% non-Hispanic Black. There were 203 recurrences and 86 deaths observed over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Five-year RFS was 59.8% (95% CI, 51.6, 67.0) versus 36.5% (95% CI, 26.6, 46.6), and 5-year OS was 87.5% (95% CI, 80.9, 91.9) versus 71.0% (95% CI, 60.3, 79.3) in private pay insurance versus Medicaid/Medicare, respectively. Multivariable showed Medicaid/Medicare patients experienced a 54% higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% CI, 1.08, 2.20) and 79% higher risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% CI, 1.02, 3.14) than privately insured patients.
Conclusions:
Significant disadvantages in RFS and OS were identified in radiation oncology patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Treatment Resistant Cancers

