Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

251
Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of...
251
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.7K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.7K
Chunking01:12

Chunking

150
Chunking is a powerful cognitive technique that improves short-term memory retention by organizing information into smaller, more manageable units. The brain, limited by working memory capacity, can more easily process and store information when it is divided into "chunks" rather than presented as discrete, unrelated elements. Chunking is especially useful when dealing with large amounts of information, such as numerical sequences, words, or complex ideas.
The principle behind chunking...
150
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

177
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
177
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

200
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
200

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of thought probes and other encoding interruptions on memory.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Individuals with higher working memory are more strategic offloaders but also greater forgetters.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Strategic value-directed remembering in younger and older adults.

Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition·2025
Same author

Memory accessibility as a cue for perceived importance.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

The Metacognitive Optimization of Offloading Task (MOOT): Both higher costs to offload and the accuracy of memory predict goodness of offloading performance.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.6K

Does point value structure influence measures of memory selectivity?

Dillon H Murphy1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Memory (Hove, England)
|June 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Different scoring structures in value-directed remembering tasks significantly impact memory selectivity measures. Researchers should carefully choose and justify value structures for accurate assessment of selective memory.

Keywords:
Value-directed rememberingrecallrecognitionselectivity

More Related Videos

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.6K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Value-directed remembering tasks utilize diverse value structures for to-be-remembered information.
  • Understanding how these structures influence memory selectivity is crucial for accurate research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different scoring structures in value-directed remembering tasks on memory selectivity measures.
  • To compare the effectiveness of various value scales and their influence on recall and recognition memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants studied word lists paired with different point value structures (e.g., 1-20, 1-10 repeating, high/low, high/medium/low).
  • Memory selectivity was assessed using free recall and recognition tests.
  • Analysis involved comparing selectivity indices and item-level recall modeling.

Main Results:

  • The range of values in a continuous scale affects selective memory in free recall.
  • Item-level recall modeling may be preferable to selectivity index analysis.
  • Value structures may lack construct validity in recognition tests.
  • The impact of value on memory is significantly greater in recall than recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must carefully consider and justify the value structure employed in list learning tasks assessing selective memory.
  • The choice of value structure can influence findings, particularly differentiating between recall and recognition memory.