Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rethinking systemic ableism: A response to Zagouras, Ellick, and Aulisio.

Erin E Andrews1,2, Kara B Ayers3,4, Joseph A Stramondo5

  • 1VA Texas Valley Coastal Bend Health Care System, Harlingen, TX, USA.

Clinical Ethics
|June 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived community-based needs of low-income parents with psychiatric disabilities who experienced legal challenges to their parenting rights.

Children and youth services review·2026
Same author

Preconception needs and experience of people with mobility disability: Qualitative study of people with lived experience and clinical experts.

Patient education and counseling·2025
Same author

Facilitators and barriers to care among individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Psychology & health·2025
Same author

Experiences with and Perceptions of the Child Welfare System During the Perinatal Period of Mothers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Journal of public child welfare·2025
Same author

Attitudes, Assumptions, and Beliefs of Obstetric Care Clinicians Regarding Perinatal Care of Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities·2025
Same author

Balancing independence: Priorities, tensions, obstacles, and facilitators for independence among young adults with skeletal dysplasia and short stature.

Journal of genetic counseling·2025

This article critiques a case study of a pregnant woman with a disability. It argues that healthcare providers and family exhibited ableism and coercion, questioning her autonomy and decision-making capacity.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Disability Studies
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • A case study examined a pregnant woman with a physical disability facing pressure to terminate her pregnancy.
  • Her healthcare team and parents questioned her decision-making capacity, citing her disability and sheltered upbringing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the original case study's analysis of a pregnant disabled woman's autonomy.
  • To highlight instances of systemic ableism and coercive practices in reproductive healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of a published case study.
  • Application of feminist and disability ethics frameworks.

Main Results:

  • The original case analysis failed to address systemic ableism and discriminatory attitudes.
Keywords:
autonomycompetencydisabilityethicspregnancy

Related Experiment Videos

  • The healthcare team's actions demonstrated infantilization and misinterpretation of relational autonomy.
  • Family coercion and healthcare provider collusion were evident in the case.
  • Conclusions:

    • The case exemplifies discriminatory and culturally incompetent reproductive healthcare for disabled women.
    • Questioning a disabled woman's autonomy requires careful consideration of societal ableism and coercion.
    • Ethical reproductive healthcare must uphold the decision-making capacity and autonomy of all individuals, irrespective of disability.