Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.9K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.9K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.8K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.8K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.2K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.2K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

5.3K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
5.3K
Choosing Between z and t Distribution01:25

Choosing Between z and t Distribution

2.8K
The z and the Student t distribution estimate the population mean using the sample mean and standard deviation. However, to decide which distribution to use for a calculation, one needs to determine the sample size, the nature of the distribution, and whether the population standard deviation is known. If the population standard deviation is known and the population is normally distributed, or if the sample size is greater than 30, the z distribution is preferred. The Student t distribution is...
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian inference for dynamic Q matrices and attribute trajectories in hidden Markov diagnostic classification models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Comparison of the different versions of the abbreviated injury scale in the assessment of isolated head trauma severity.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Semi-Parametric Item Response Theory With O'Sullivan Splines for Item Responses and Response Time.

Applied psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Erratum: A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.

Psychometrika·2024
Same author

Relationship between Aspartame-Induced Cerebral Cortex Injury and Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and Apoptosis in Sprague Dawley Rats.

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Innovative analysis of diazepam, zolpidem and their main metabolites in human urine by micelle-to-solvent stacking in capillary electrophoresis.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K

Online Parameter Estimation for Student Evaluation of Teaching.

Chia-Wen Chen1, Chen-Wei Liu2

  • 1University of Oslo, Norway.

Applied Psychological Measurement
|June 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces new methods to improve student evaluation of teaching (SET) by accounting for student rating harshness. The hybrid approach offers a more precise assessment of teaching proficiency in online environments.

Keywords:
item response theoryparameter estimationstudent evaluation of teaching

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.9K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Higher Education Research

Background:

  • Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) is crucial for assessing teaching performance.
  • Current SET methods often fail to account for student rating harshness, impacting assessment validity.
  • Online SET lacks robust methods for simultaneously estimating teaching proficiency and student harshness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare novel statistical methods for SET parameter estimation.
  • To address the unaddressed issue of simultaneously estimating teaching proficiency and student harshness in online SET.
  • To improve the precision of parameter estimations in computerized adaptive testing for SET.

Main Methods:

  • Development of three novel methods: marginal, iterative once, and hybrid approaches.
  • Utilizing a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods.
  • Comparison of the novel methods against traditional scoring techniques.

Main Results:

  • The hybrid method demonstrated substantial outperformance compared to traditional methods.
  • The proposed methods showed improved precision in parameter estimations.
  • The simulation study confirmed the efficacy of the developed techniques.

Conclusions:

  • The hybrid method is a promising technique for enhancing the validity of online SET.
  • Accurate estimation of teaching proficiency requires accounting for student rating harshness.
  • Further research into advanced psychometric models for SET is warranted.