Nursing Implementation
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Tertiary Healthcare System
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Integrated Healthcare System
Nursing Clinical Information System
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Paula Gobi Scudeller1,2, Celina de Almeida Lamas1,2, Aline Morgan Alvarenga1,2
1Digital Health, Technological Innovation Hub (InovaHC); Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
This report describes the creation and growth of a remote intensive care support program in Brazil. Starting during the pandemic, the initiative provided expert guidance and training to hospitals across the country. By connecting specialists with local staff, the program improved patient care and reduced hospital stays. The authors discuss how this model can shape future digital health efforts in the national system.
Area of Science:
Background:
Remote clinical support systems remain underutilized in many developing healthcare environments. Prior research has shown that distance-based consultation can bridge gaps in specialized expertise. That uncertainty drove the need for scalable digital frameworks during public health crises. No prior work had resolved how to integrate such systems within large, decentralized national networks. This gap motivated the development of a structured remote support model. Earlier studies focused primarily on high-resource settings rather than broad public health implementation. Existing literature lacked evidence on the long-term viability of these programs in diverse regional settings. This report addresses the challenges of scaling digital care across vast geographic areas.
Purpose Of The Study:
The authors aimed to describe the implementation and expansion of a remote intensive care support program in Brazil. This report seeks to highlight the pillars of success and future perspectives for the initiative. The researchers intended to document how the program emerged during the pandemic to support local practitioners. They sought to explain the transition from a single hospital pilot to a national network. The team aimed to evaluate the impact of clinical case discussions on patient care. They intended to clarify how the program addressed the needs of high-risk groups like obstetric patients. The study aims to provide a record of the largest digital health intensive care effort in the national system. Finally, the authors intended to offer guidance for future digital health initiatives based on their findings.
Main Methods:
The team conducted a descriptive analysis of the program implementation and subsequent expansion phases. They reviewed the operational framework established at the primary academic medical center. The approach involved documenting the transition from a single-site pilot to a multi-regional network. Researchers tracked the number of participating hospitals and the volume of remote clinical interactions. They evaluated the educational impact by recording the total count of trained health practitioners. The study team assessed the integration of specialized segments, such as obstetric care, within the broader digital framework. They synthesized data regarding the geographic distribution of the network across different macroregions. The authors utilized internal project logs to verify the scope of the initiative within the national system.
Main Results:
The program successfully assisted 40 hospitals across various national macroregions. The initiative facilitated more than 11,500 teleinterconsultations between health care professionals. Researchers documented the training of over 14,800 health care practitioners through the platform. The team observed a reduction in both mortality rates and the duration of hospital stays for patients. A specialized segment for obstetrics was launched to address the needs of a susceptible patient group. This specific segment is currently slated for expansion to 27 additional facilities. The project represents the largest digital intensive care program established within the national health system to date. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of remote support in managing high-acuity cases during the pandemic.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that the remote support model significantly improved patient outcomes during the pandemic. They suggest that the program serves as a viable template for future digital health initiatives. The researchers note that the initiative successfully reduced mortality rates across participating facilities. They highlight that the expansion to obstetrics care addressed a specific, high-risk patient population. The team reports that the program represents the largest digital intensive care effort within the national system. They conclude that the initiative provided necessary support to local practitioners during periods of high demand. The authors emphasize that the platform facilitated unprecedented levels of medical information exchange. They maintain that these results provide a foundation for ongoing digital health integration nationwide.
The program utilized a licensed online platform to facilitate teleinterconsultations. This mechanism allowed for the exchange of medical information between specialists and local staff, which the researchers propose helped reduce patient mortality and length of stay in participating facilities.
The initiative employed a digital health platform to connect professionals. According to the authors, this tool was necessary for supporting staff across forty hospitals, enabling over 11,500 consultations and training more than 14,800 practitioners during the pandemic.
A licensed online platform was required to ensure secure medical information exchange. The researchers propose that this technology was necessary to maintain consistent communication standards across diverse macroregions, ensuring that remote guidance remained effective for local teams.
Teleinterconsultations served as the primary data type for evaluating program impact. The authors report that these exchanges allowed for real-time clinical guidance, which the team suggests played a role in managing COVID-19 cases effectively.
The program measured success through the number of consultations and training sessions provided. The researchers report that over 11,500 consultations occurred, alongside the training of 14,800 professionals, which the team suggests demonstrates the program's reach.
The authors propose that the program serves as a model for future digital health initiatives. They suggest that the success of this project provides a framework for integrating remote support into the national health system.