Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers
Farid Rahimi1, Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi2
1Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, ACT, Australia. farid.rahimi@anu.edu.au.
ChatGPT jeopardizes academic publication integrity by failing authorship criteria. Current publishing policies are unguided, necessitating urgent revisions to address AI-generated content in scientific reporting.
Area of Science:
- Academic Publishing
- Scientific Integrity
- Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Background:
- ChatGPT's capabilities challenge traditional academic publishing standards.
- The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established authorship criteria that AI tools like ChatGPT do not fully meet.
- The academic publishing industry lacks clear guidelines for handling manuscripts that credit AI content generators.
Related Concept Videos
Passive Diffusion: Overview and Kinetics
When administered orally, drugs establish a substantial concentration gradient between the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen and the bloodstream, expediting...
GTPases and their Regulation
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus
For finding the surface area, consider a differential line element that generates a ring with surface area dA when revolved.
Gauss's Law
Potential Energy due to Gravitation
Consider a mass gravitationally bound to another object. For example, the Earth is gravitationally bound to the Sun’s gravitational field. The potential...

