Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

519
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
519
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

425
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
425
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

490
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
490

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robot-mediated haptic feedback outperforms vision in violin duo coordination.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

Haptic feedback in violin education as a case study of robotic exoskeleton-mediated motor learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A Closed-loop Platform for the Embodiment of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs During Augmented Tasks.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Characterization of electrotactile stimulation intensity to exploit the funneling illusion.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Robot-Mediated Physical Human-Human Interaction in Rehabilitation: A Position Paper.

IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Corticospinal imbalance following major upper limb amputation is transiently modulated by continuous theta burst stimulation.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K

Comparing end-effector position and joint angle feedback for online robotic limb tracking.

Mattia Pinardi1, Alessia Noccaro2, Luigi Raiano1

  • 1NEXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Plos One
|June 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Supplementary haptic feedback aids robotic arm control. Task-space feedback improved accuracy, while Joint-space feedback showed greater long-term learning potential for human movement augmentation.

More Related Videos

Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms
10:32

Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms

Published on: August 15, 2016

15.5K
Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
05:25

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K
Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms
10:32

Robotic Mirror Therapy System for Functional Recovery of Hemiplegic Arms

Published on: August 15, 2016

15.5K
Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
05:25

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Human-robot interaction
  • Haptic feedback systems
  • Robotics and control

Background:

  • Somatosensation enhances natural body control.
  • Supplementing vision with haptic feedback may improve robotic arm control proficiency.
  • The optimal reference frame (extrinsic vs. intrinsic) for robotic limb feedback is unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of two supplementary haptic feedback types for controlling a robotic arm.
  • To determine if Task-space (end-effector coordinates) or Joint-space (joint angles) feedback is superior for robotic arm control.

Main Methods:

  • Blindfolded participants received vibrotactile feedback on their legs.
  • Two feedback conditions were tested: Task-space and Joint-space.
  • Participants trained for 1.5 hours with both feedback types in a 2-Degrees of Freedom (DoFs) robotic arm configuration.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated significantly higher accuracy with Task-space feedback (lower position and aiming errors).
  • No significant difference in control speed (onset delay) was observed between feedback types.
  • Joint-space feedback exhibited a significantly higher learning index during training compared to Task-space feedback.

Conclusions:

  • Task-space feedback is more intuitive and suitable for short training sessions.
  • Joint-space feedback shows potential for long-term improvement and may be better for extensive training.
  • Joint-space feedback could be advantageous for applications like controlling supernumerary robotic limbs in surgery or industrial manufacturing.