Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Impact of Different Mammography Systems on Artificial Intelligence Performance in Breast Cancer Screening
Clarisse F de Vries1, Samantha J Colosimo1, Roger T Staff1
1From the Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences (C.F.d.V., M.B., L.A.A.), School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition (S.J.C., R.T.S.), and Grampian Data Safe Haven (DaSH), Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences (J.A.D.), University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland; National Health Service Grampian (NHSG), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland (S.J.C., R.T.S., G.L.); Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, England (J.Y., D.D.); and School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland (D.J.H.).
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may assist breast screening mammography programs, but limited evidence supports their generalizability to new settings. This retrospective study used a 3-year dataset (April 1, 2016-March 31, 2019) from a U.K. regional screening program. The performance of a commercially available breast screening AI algorithm was assessed with a prespecified and site-specific decision threshold to evaluate whether its performance was transferable to a new clinical site. The dataset consisted of women (aged approximately 50-70 years) who attended routine screening, excluding self-referrals, those with complex physical requirements, those who had undergone a previous mastectomy, and those who underwent screening that had technical recalls or did not have the four standard image views. In total, 55 916 screening attendees (mean age, 60 years ± 6 [SD]) met the inclusion criteria. The prespecified threshold resulted in high recall rates (48.3%, 21 929 of 45 444), which reduced to 13.0% (5896 of 45 444) following threshold calibration, closer to the observed service level (5.0%, 2774 of 55 916). Recall rates also increased approximately threefold following a software upgrade on the mammography equipment, requiring per-software version thresholds. Using software-specific thresholds, the AI algorithm would have recalled 277 of 303 (91.4%) screen-detected cancers and 47 of 138 (34.1%) interval cancers. AI performance and thresholds should be validated for new clinical settings before deployment, while quality assurance systems should monitor AI performance for consistency. Keywords: Breast, Screening, Mammography, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis, Neoplasms-Primary, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
More Related Videos
08:32Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014