Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modelling the role of the microbiome in antimicrobial resistance across scales.

Nature microbiology·2026
Same author

PlasticEnz: An integrated database and screening tool combining homology and machine learning to identify plastic-degrading enzymes in meta-omics datasets.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Keystone concept revisited: insights into microbial community dynamics and control.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2026
Same author

Emergence of alternative states in a synthetic human gut microbial community.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Growth stage and interspecies interactions shape the cell biology and cell cycle characteristics of human gut bacteria Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Roseburia intestinalis.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Differential recovery of chain-elongating bacteria: comparing droplet, plating, and dilution-to-extinction methods.

mSystems·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Kinetic Visualization of Single-Cell Interspecies Bacterial Interactions
08:33

Kinetic Visualization of Single-Cell Interspecies Bacterial Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

7.0K

Deciphering Interactions Within a 4-Strain Riverine Bacterial Community.

Mathias Bonal1,2, Lise Goetghebuer1, Clémence Joseph2

  • 1Laboratory of Ecology of Aquatic Systems, Brussels Bioengineering School, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

Current Microbiology
|June 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microbial community dynamics reveal that interactions depend on growth phases. Even minor bacterial strains can significantly impact dominant species, challenging linear models.

More Related Videos

Coincubation Assay for Quantifying Competitive Interactions between Vibrio fischeri Isolates
07:43

Coincubation Assay for Quantifying Competitive Interactions between Vibrio fischeri Isolates

Published on: July 22, 2019

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Developing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Generating Second-Generation Biofertilizers
04:29

Author Spotlight: Developing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Generating Second-Generation Biofertilizers

Published on: May 24, 2024

874

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Kinetic Visualization of Single-Cell Interspecies Bacterial Interactions
08:33

Kinetic Visualization of Single-Cell Interspecies Bacterial Interactions

Published on: August 5, 2020

7.0K
Coincubation Assay for Quantifying Competitive Interactions between Vibrio fischeri Isolates
07:43

Coincubation Assay for Quantifying Competitive Interactions between Vibrio fischeri Isolates

Published on: July 22, 2019

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Developing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Generating Second-Generation Biofertilizers
04:29

Author Spotlight: Developing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Generating Second-Generation Biofertilizers

Published on: May 24, 2024

874

Area of Science:

  • Microbial ecology
  • Bacterial community dynamics
  • Ecological interactions

Background:

  • River water harbors diverse bacterial communities.
  • Understanding inter-strain interactions is crucial for microbial ecology.
  • Planktonic bacterial dynamics are influenced by various factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dynamics of four riverine bacterial strains in co-culture.
  • To construct interaction networks and analyze growth phase-specific effects.
  • To assess the predictive power of monoculture growth on co-culture carrying capacity.

Main Methods:

  • Batch experiments with four bacterial strains (Janthinobacterium sp., Brevundimonas sp., Flavobacterium sp., Variovorax sp.).
  • 16S rRNA gene sequencing and flow cytometry for strain abundance monitoring.
  • Construction of interaction networks based on growth rate and carrying capacity.

Main Results:

  • Absence of positive interactions, with some phase-specific differences observed.
  • Janthinobacterium sp. dominated but was negatively impacted by less abundant strains.
  • Growth rate in monoculture predicted carrying capacity in co-culture.

Conclusions:

  • Ecological interactions in microbial communities are growth phase-dependent.
  • Minor strains can exert significant influence on dominant populations.
  • Accurate microbial community modeling requires considering non-linear dependencies.