Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Published on: January 25, 2016
Health Utilities of Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss with Assistive Devices
Yi-Wen Chen1,2, Pei-Hsuan Lin3, Te-Yung Fang4,5
1Department of Pharmacy, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11696, Taiwan.
Insights
This study measured health utilities for children with severe hearing loss using assistive devices. Bilateral cochlear implants showed the highest utility, offering crucial data for health technology assessments.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Health Economics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Congenital hearing loss affects newborns, impacting auditory and speech development.
- Early intervention with assistive devices is crucial for improving outcomes in children.
- Quantifying health utilities associated with different assistive devices is essential for informed decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure and compare the health utilities of children with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing impairment using various assistive devices.
- To provide data for cost-utility analyses and health technology assessments.
Main Methods:
- Developed descriptions of four hypothetical health states: no devices, bilateral hearing aids, bimodal hearing, and bilateral cochlear implants.
- Collected utility values from 37 healthcare professionals using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Time Trade-Off (TTO) methods.
- Analyzed utility scores to determine significant differences between health states.
Main Results:
- Mean VAS utility scores: 0.31 (no devices), 0.41 (hearing aids), 0.63 (bimodal), 0.82 (cochlear implants).
- Mean TTO utility scores: 0.60 (no devices), 0.69 (hearing aids), 0.81 (bimodal), 0.90 (cochlear implants).
- Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between all pairwise comparisons of health states for both VAS and TTO.
Conclusions:
- This study successfully elicited health utility values for different assistive devices in pediatric bilateral hearing impairment.
- The obtained utility data are critical for future cost-utility analyses and health technology assessments.
- Assistive devices significantly improve health utility, with bilateral cochlear implants demonstrating the highest value.
Abstract:
Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder in newborns. Early intervention with assistive devices benefits children's auditory and speech performance. This study aimed to measure the health utilities of children with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing impairment with different assistive devices. The descriptions of four hypothetical health states were developed, and their utility values were obtained from healthcare professionals via the visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Thirty-seven healthcare professionals completed the TTO interview and were included in the analysis. The mean utility scores obtained via VAS were 0.31 for no assistive devices, 0.41 for bilateral hearing aids, 0.63 for bimodal hearing, and 0.82 for bilateral cochlear implants. As for the utility scores obtained via TTO, mean values were 0.60, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively. None of the four groups had the same VAS- or TTO-elicited utility (p < 0.001). The post hoc test results showed that the difference was significant between any two groups (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study elicited health utility of bilateral hearing impairment with different assistive devices using the VAS and TTO methods. The utility values obtained provide critical data for future cost-utility analysis and health technology assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

