Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management01:28

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management

100
Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
100
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction01:30

Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction

217
Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) is characterized by mucosal excavation in the esophagus, stomach, pylorus, or duodenum. It can manifest as acute or chronic based on the extent and duration of mucosal involvement.
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
217
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction01:24

Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

203
Esophageal varices are dilated, tortuous veins which are found mainly in the submucosa of the lower esophagus but which may also appear higher up or extend into the stomach. They develop due to increased pressure in the portal venous system, often as a result of liver cirrhosis. This condition scars and damages the liver, impeding normal blood flow through the portal vein. To compensate, blood seeks alternative pathways, forming fragile new vessels (varices) in the esophagus and stomach. These...
203
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data01:17

Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data

235
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
235
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:23

Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management

342
The clinical manifestations of gastritis can vary depending on the cause and type of gastritis, but some common symptoms may include the following.
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
342
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

238
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
238

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: 2022 audit update.

Gut·2025
Same author

Variceal band ligation and carvedilol: together forever, or not?

Gut·2024
Same author

Study protocol for a Randomised controlled trial of EArly transjugular intrahepatiC porTosystemic stent-shunt in Acute Variceal Bleeding (REACT-AVB trial).

BMJ open gastroenterology·2024
Same author

Update on the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

BMJ medicine·2023
Same author

Letter: improve survival in variceal bleeding in cirrhosis-place pTIPS as early as possible after index bleed. Authors' reply.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2023
Same author

Editorial: the impact of red blood cell transfusion on inpatient mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.1K

A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Josh Orpen-Palmer1, Adrian J Stanley1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|June 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The Glasgow Blatchford Score effectively identifies very low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) for safe outpatient management. Current risk scores struggle to accurately predict high-risk adverse events, but AI shows promise for future dynamic risk assessment.

Keywords:
acute gastrointestinal haemorrhagenon-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingpeptic ulcer bleedingrisk scoresrisk stratificationvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
05:50

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care

Published on: September 22, 2023

3.0K
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.1K
Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
05:50

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care

Published on: September 22, 2023

3.0K
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.9K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a frequent medical emergency requiring prompt assessment and resuscitation.
  • Risk stratification is crucial for guiding patient management, differentiating between low- and high-risk individuals.
  • Validated risk scores aid in determining the need for hospitalization versus outpatient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of risk scores in managing upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • To identify the optimal risk score for safely discharging very low-risk patients.
  • To explore the potential of emerging technologies for improved risk prediction in UGIB.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on upper gastrointestinal bleeding management and risk stratification tools.
  • Analysis of the performance of established risk scores, specifically the Glasgow Blatchford Score.
  • Examination of the evolving role of machine learning and artificial intelligence in predicting UGIB outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The Glasgow Blatchford Score (0-1) demonstrates high accuracy in identifying very low-risk UGIB patients suitable for outpatient management.
  • Existing risk scores exhibit limitations in consistently and accurately identifying high-risk patients and specific adverse events.
  • Machine learning and AI models show potential for enhancing dynamic risk assessment in UGIB.

Conclusions:

  • The Glasgow Blatchford Score is a recommended tool for safe outpatient management of selected very low-risk UGIB patients.
  • There is a need for improved risk prediction tools to accurately identify high-risk UGIB patients.
  • Future advancements in AI and machine learning are expected to significantly improve risk assessment and patient outcomes in UGIB.