Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018
Multi-state network meta-analysis of progression and survival data.
Jeroen P Jansen1,2, Devin Incerti3, Thomas A Trikalinos4
1Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
This study introduces a novel network meta-analysis method for jointly synthesizing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data. This approach enhances cancer treatment effectiveness analysis by modeling complex time-varying effects.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Network meta-analysis synthesizes evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials.
- Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are key cancer treatment efficacy endpoints.
- Existing methods often analyze OS and PFS separately.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a joint network meta-analysis method for time-to-event outcomes (PFS and OS).
- To enable robust comparison of multiple cancer interventions within a network.
- To facilitate more accurate decision and cost-effectiveness analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilizes a time-inhomogeneous tri-state Markov model (stable, progression, death).
- Models time-varying transition rates and relative treatment effects using parametric survival functions or fractional polynomials.
- Extracts data directly from published survival curves.
Main Results:
- The method allows joint synthesis of PFS and OS data.
- It relaxes the proportional hazards assumption, accommodating time-varying effects.
- The approach is applicable to networks with more than two treatments.
Conclusions:
- The proposed joint network meta-analysis method offers a flexible and comprehensive approach to synthesizing cancer treatment effectiveness data.
- It improves upon existing methods by jointly analyzing OS and PFS and relaxing restrictive assumptions.
- This methodology can enhance the precision of treatment comparisons and inform healthcare decision-making.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:41Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis