Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

06:36
A Novel Tenorrhaphy Suture Technique with Tissue Engineered Collagen Graft to Repair Large Tendon Defects
Published on: December 10, 2021
2.9K
[Comparison between different anchors for zone I flexor tendon repair]
Summary
This study compared transosseous anchors for zone I deep flexor tendon repair. No significant differences in complications or functional recovery were found between anchor types, though placement ease varied.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Hand surgery
- Tendon repair
Context:
- Transosseous reinsertion complements the Bunnell pull-out technique for zone I deep flexor tendon injuries.
- Various anchor devices are available for this surgical procedure.
- Comparative data on device performance is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose:
- To compare different transosseous anchor devices used in zone I deep flexor tendon repair.
- To evaluate complications, functional recovery, and ease of use associated with various anchors.
- To identify potential differences in intraoperative performance and patient outcomes.
Summary:
- A single-center study analyzed 27 patients undergoing transosseous anchor reinsertion for zone I deep flexor tendon injuries between 2010 and 2021.
- Microfix®, Quickanchor plus®, Miniquick anchor®, Juggerknot® Soft Anchor, and Kerifix® anchors were evaluated.
- While Juggerknot® anchors showed a significant difference in the number of anchors used intraoperatively, no significant differences in complications or quickDASH functional recovery scores were observed across the different anchor types.
Impact:
- The findings suggest that current transosseous anchor options provide comparable clinical outcomes for zone I deep flexor tendon repair.
- The study highlights potential variations in intraoperative handling and grip during anchor placement.
- This research aids surgeons in selecting appropriate devices based on both clinical outcomes and intraoperative characteristics.

