Estimation of Vitamin D Levels in Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusions and a Comparison With Age-Matched Control...

Background In the older population, retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a major contributor to vision loss and blindness. RVO is the second most common form of retinal vascular disease, following diabetic retinopathy. On the other hand, there is a paucity of studies on vitamin D insufficiency and its influence on the causation of RVOs. The goal of this study is to demonstrate a link between vitamin D levels of individuals in rural India who have RVOs. Methods This study is a hospital-based prospective case-control study. All patients aged 18 years and above with RVO visiting the ophthalmology outpatient department at a tertiary care facility in central India and all controls in the same age group were chosen for the study after taking into consideration inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fasting for 12 hours prior to blood sample collection was required of all participants. The total vitamin D concentration in the serum was determined using tandem mass spectrometry after it had been frozen at 20°C. For this study, vitamin D levels were collected from 70 participants. Results The average age is 60, with a standard variation of 10 for both cases and controls. There is a 49% prevalence of central RVO (CRVO), 34% prevalence of inferotemporal branched RVO (IT BRVO), and 17% prevalence of superotemporal BRVO (ST BRVO). Twenty percent of the 35 patients were deficient in vitamin D, and 80% had insufficient levels. No case patient had vitamin D levels within the normal range. No one with vitamin D insufficiency was found among the 35 controls. Twenty-five percent of the patients had adequate vitamin D levels, but only 28.6% of the controls did. The p-value of 0.01 indicates a remarkable difference in vitamin D levels between the diagnosed cases and controls. Cases had mean vitamin D levels of 21.408 +/- 4.947 ng/dl, while controls had mean levels of 37.808 +/- 11.799 ng/dl. Vitamin D levels did not differ significantly across RVO subtypes. The study also shows the association of RVO with hypertension (HTN) and dyslipidemia as the p-value was noted to be significant (p = 0.0147 < p = 0.05) for HTN with an odds ratio of 3.43 (CI, 1.25-9.4) and was significant (p = 0.0404 < p = 0.05) for dyslipidemia with an odds ratio of 4.87 (CI, 0.96-24.97). Diabetes, smoking, hyperhomocysteinemia, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular accident are all well-known risk factors, but we found no evidence associating them together. Conclusion  Vitamin D proved to be an important risk factor in the causation of RVOs. Other risk factors like HTN and dyslipidemia also showed significant relation in the study. Vitamin D levels should be advised as a routine investigation in patients who are diagnosed with RVOs along with screening for other risk factors. Vitamin D supplementation should be given as prophylaxis in cases of deficiency.