How Far Has Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Come Along as a Treatment Procedure in Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia...

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) refers to sudden shooting pain in areas innervated by trigeminal nerves originating from the Gasserian ganglion. Physicians initially manage it by prescribing drugs, such as carbamazepine. Surgical intervention is the next best option if patients do not respond to drug treatments. These procedures include microvascular decompression, rhizotomy, balloon compression, and gamma knife surgery. However, less optimal patient outcomes, recurrences, adverse effects, and high costs have necessitated alternative surgical interventions to treat such patients. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) has emerged as a minimally invasive, safer, and effective surgical option in treating TN patients. Despite research showing RFT's safety and effectiveness, neurosurgical healthcare providers do not frequently use it to treat TN patients. Lack of universal standardized protocol, and minimal awareness of its efficacy in specific cohorts, such as geriatric patients, may lead to RFT underutilization. Hence, this review highlights RFT's advancement as a robust alternative to traditional surgical approaches in treating TN patients. In addition, it identifies RFT's areas of improvement and its safety and effectiveness in treating elderly TN patients. We followed the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for systematic reviews and conducted a literature search between July 2022 and March 2023. Our findings indicate that RFT has evolved significantly over the last decade and a half as a minimally invasive and effective treatment procedure for TN patients. It is more effective as a combined continuous and pulsed RFT than its other subtypes in treating primary TN patients. Moreover, RFT via a transverse puncture through the supraorbital foramen results in lesser inter- and post-procedural complications. Further, there is a slightly lesser incidence of post-procedural adverse effects and complications with RFT through the foramen rotundum. Besides, RFT, performed at a lower temperature of 65 degrees Celsius and a voltage between 64.51 and 79.29 volts, effectively provides pain relief and long-term patient satisfaction. RFT is safe and effective in patients over 60 with primary TN. Interestingly, it is also safe and effective in treating patients over 70 with poor fitness standards of Class II or higher. Despite these remarkable findings, there is still a substantial gap in the literature, specifically concerning the standardized protocol for temperature, voltage, and puncture methods of RFT. Despite the sufficient evidence of combined continuous and pulsed RFT's superiority in efficacy and safety, most researchers still utilize either pulsed or continuous RFT. Studies vary in not only these aspects but also the patient cohorts. For instance, most researchers focus solely on evaluating RFT's efficacy and safety in patients with primary TN, excluding a critical patient population suffering from secondary TN. Nevertheless, sufficient clinical evidence shows that RFT has come of age in treating primary TN patients. However, more extensive studies with large sample sizes of patients with primary and secondary TN with multiple trigeminal nerve affectation will significantly help standardize RFT protocol and its inclusion in the standard clinical practice in treating TN patients.