Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Lead Time and Tailored Messaging Promote Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
Same author

Advancing disability inclusion in nursing education: A call for national data collection and collective leadership.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2025
Same author

Efimosfermin alfa (BOS-580), a long-acting FGF21 analogue, in participants with phenotypic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2025
Same author

Disability and Accommodation Use in US Bachelor of Science in Nursing Programs.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Obesity and GLP-1s.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2025
Same author

Spread the Word: No Amount of Alcohol is Safe!

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2024
Same journal

The Public Trust in Nursing: Is It Waning?

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
Same journal

Budd-Chiari Syndrome Due to Protein C Deficiency: A Case Report.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
Same journal

Minimum Registered Nurse Staffing for Patient Care in the Gastroenterology/Endoscopy Setting.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
Same journal

Ergonomic Considerations in ERCP Practice.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
Same journal

Factors Associated With Intention to Undergo Colonoscopy Reexamination Based on Pender's Health Promotion Model: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

716

Adenoma Detection Rate Benchmarks: An Updated Analysis.

Linda Morrow1,2, Beverly Greenwald1,2

  • 1Linda Morrow, DNP, MSN, MBA, NE-BC, CPHQ, CNOR, RN, is Program Director, Nursing Management and Executive Leadership, Clinical Associate Professor of Nursing, Dr. Susan L. Davis & Richard J. Henley College of Nursing, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut.

Gastroenterology Nursing : the Official Journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
|June 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The recommended colorectal cancer screening age is now 45, impacting adenoma detection rate benchmarks. Current benchmarks can be applied to younger patients, but gender-specific rates may be needed.

More Related Videos

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:08

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

110
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
07:34

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

716
Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:08

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

110
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Endoscopic Quality Metrics

Background:

  • Early-onset colorectal cancer has led to a reduced screening age from 50 to 45 years.
  • The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends quality indicators for colonoscopy.
  • Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality measure, with benchmarks established for patients aged 50+.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of the new screening age on adenoma detection rate benchmarks.
  • To determine if current benchmarks are applicable to the 45-50 age group.
  • To explore potential gender-based differences in adenoma detection rates.

Main Methods:

  • A review of five studies examining adenoma detection rates.
  • Analysis of data including patients aged 45-50.
  • Comparison of combined and gender-specific adenoma detection rates.

Main Results:

  • Patients aged 45-50 should be included in ADR calculations using existing benchmarks (25% combined, or 20% female/30% male separately).
  • Males consistently showed higher adenoma prevalence than females in studies separating genders.
  • One study suggested separate gender-based benchmarks may be warranted.

Conclusions:

  • Current adenoma detection rate benchmarks are adaptable for the 45-50 age group.
  • Gender-specific adenoma detection rates might improve quality assessment in some practices.
  • Further research is necessary to refine screening quality metrics for evolving colorectal cancer screening guidelines.