Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Control Test for Global Use.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026

Same author

Curiosity and evidence quality affect information seeking and eye movements during reading.

Cognition·2026

Same author

Neonatal amygdala and fear processing across early childhood.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2026

Same author

The Effect of Relevance on Children's Multiple Text Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026

Same author

Who gets it? Explaining variability in children's written irony comprehension.

Journal of child language·2026

Same author

Individual and Situational Predictors of Threatening Dream Content During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of sleep research·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

Children's processing of written irony: An eye-tracking study.

Henri Olkoniemi¹, Sohvi Halonen², Penny M Pexman³

¹Division of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Oulu, Finland; Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Finland.

|June 15, 2023

Summary

Children find understanding written irony more challenging than adults do, requiring more cognitive effort. However, both age groups improve irony processing with practice, showing developmental adaptations.

Keywords:

Children Eye movements Irony Language development Reading

More Related Videos

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive Development
Developmental Psychology
Linguistics

Background:

Irony comprehension is a complex cognitive skill crucial for social interaction.
Existing theories often overlook developmental changes in understanding verbal irony.
Limited research exists on how children process written irony compared to adults.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the developmental differences in processing written irony between children and adults.
To examine the cognitive costs associated with irony comprehension in different age groups.
To explore how reading skills and practice influence irony processing in children.

Main Methods:

A pre-registered study comparing 35 10-year-old children and 35 adults.
Participants read ironic and literal sentences within story contexts.
Eye movements were recorded, alongside text memory and inference questions, and children's reading skills were assessed.

Main Results:

Both children and adults exhibited an 'irony effect,' finding ironic texts more difficult than literal ones.
Children demonstrated greater difficulty with irony comprehension than adults.
Despite longer reading times in children, irony processing patterns were similar, with age-related differences in accuracy-speed trade-offs.

Conclusions:

Comprehending written irony presents a significant challenge, particularly for children, highlighting developmental differences.
Both children and adults can adapt and improve their irony processing through contextual learning and practice.
The study offers novel insights into the cognitive demands of irony and the development of compensatory strategies.