Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Effect of Gaussian Smoothing Filter Size for CT-Based Attenuation Correction on Quantitative Assessment of Bone
Yoya Tomita1, Yasutaka Ichikawa2, Kengo Hashizume1
1Central Division of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Abstract:
This study aims to determine the effect of Gaussian filter size for CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) on the quantitative assessment of bone SPECT. An experiment was performed using a cylindrical phantom containing six rods, of which one was filled with water and five were filled with various concentrations of K2HPO4 solution (120-960 mg/cm3) to simulate different bone densities. 99mTc-solution of 207 kBq/ml was also included within the rods. SPECT data were acquired at 120 views for 30 s/view. CT for attenuation correction were obtained at 120 kVp and 100 mA. Sixteen different CTAC maps processed with different Gaussian filter sizes (ranging from 0 to 30 mm in 2 mm increments) were generated. SPECT images were reconstructed for each of the 16 CTAC maps. Attenuation coefficients and radioactivity concentrations in the rods were compared with those in the water-filled rod without K2HPO4 solution as a reference. Gaussian filter sizes below 14-16 mm resulted in an overestimation of radioactivity concentrations for rods with high concentrations of K2HPO4 (≥ 666 mg/cm3). The overestimation of radioactivity concentration measurement was 3.8% and 5.5% for 666 mg/cm3 and 960 mg/cm3 K2HPO4 solutions, respectively. The difference in radioactivity concentration between the water rod and the K2HPO4 rods was minimal at 18-22 mm. The use of Gaussian filter sizes smaller than 14-16 mm caused an overestimation of radioactivity concentration in regions of high CT values. Setting the Gaussian filter size to 18-22 mm enables radioactivity concentration to be measured with the least influence on bone density.
More Related Videos
07:10A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT
Published on: June 12, 2020
09:36Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018