Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

07:27
Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
Published on: October 6, 2016
10.3K
Quantifying Physical Resilience in Ageing Using Measurement Instruments: A Scoping Review.
Sue Peters1, Theodore D Cosco2,3, Dawn C Mackey4,5
1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada
|June 16, 2023
Summary
Physical resilience measurement instruments are reviewed, revealing gaps in capturing social aspects. Comprehensive tools are needed to guide rehabilitation and therapeutic decisions for older adults.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Rehabilitation Science
- Health Measurement
Background:
- Physical resilience, the ability to recover motor function despite health issues or aging, lacks standardized measurement.
- Existing instruments for assessing physical resilience in older adults are not fully characterized across all relevant outcome domains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review to identify measurement instruments for physical resilience.
- To identify research gaps in the measurement of physical resilience.
- To provide recommendations for future research directions in physical resilience assessment.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search was conducted for articles including the term 'resilience' in relation to older adults' physical health.
- Data extraction focused on outcome domains: body function/structure, activity/participation, and societal impact.
- Measurement instruments were categorized into psychological, physiological, motor function, and psychosocial scales.
Main Results:
- Thirty-three articles were included, primarily focusing on older adults with fractures, cardiac conditions, and cancer.
- Instruments frequently measured body function/structure, with some addressing activity/participation and societal impact.
- A significant gap was identified in instruments capturing the social dimensions of physical resilience.
Conclusions:
- Current measurement instruments for physical resilience are fragmented and do not comprehensively cover all outcome domains.
- A need exists for integrated measurement tools that incorporate psychological, physiological, motor, psychosocial, and social aspects.
- Developing comprehensive measurement strategies can inform targeted interventions to foster resilience and improve rehabilitation outcomes.

