Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Activating Molecules, Ions, and Solid Particles with Acoustic Cavitation
Published on: April 11, 2014
Generalised analytical model of the transition power densities of the upconversion luminescence and quantum yield
J S Matias1,2, K Komolibus1, K W Kho1
1Biophotonics@Tyndall, IPIC, Tyndall National Institute Cork Ireland jean.matias@tyndall.ie.
Abstract:
The quantum yield (QY) evaluation of upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs) is an essential step in the characterisation of such materials. The QY of UCNPs is governed by competing mechanisms of populating and depopulating the electronic energy levels involved in the upconversion (UC), namely linear decay rates and energy transfer rates. As a consequence, at low excitation, the QY excitation power density (ρ) dependence obeys the power law ρ, where n represents the number of absorbed photons required for the emission of a single upconverted photon and determines the order of the energy transfer upconversion (ETU) process. At high power densities, the QY transits to a saturation level independent of the ETU process and the number of excitation photons, as a result of an anomalous power density dependence present in UCNPs. Despite the importance of this non-linear process for several applications (e.g., living tissue imaging and super-resolution-microscopy), little has been reported in the literature regarding theoretical studies to describe the UC QY, especially for ETUs with order higher than two. Therefore, this work presents a simple general analytical model, which introduces the concept of the transition power density points and QY saturation to characterise the QY of an arbitrary ETU process. The transition power density points determine where the power density dependence of the QY and the UC luminescence changes. The results provided in this paper from fitting the model to experimental QY data of a Yb-Tm codoped β-UCNP for 804 nm and 474 nm emissions (ETU2 and ETU3 processes, respectively) exemplify the application of the model. The common transition points found for both processes were compared to each other showing strong agreement with theory, as well as, compared to previous reports when possible.
More Related Videos
11:26Integrating a Triplet-triplet Annihilation Up-conversion System to Enhance Dye-sensitized Solar Cell Response to Sub-bandgap Light
Published on: September 12, 2014
11:20An Integrated System to Remotely Trigger Intracellular Signal Transduction by Upconversion Nanoparticle-mediated Kinase Photoactivation
Published on: August 30, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Deactivation Processes: Jablonski Diagram
Photoluminescence: Applications
Photoluminescence: Fluorescence and Phosphorescence
A pair of electrons in a...
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
Molecular Spectroscopy: Absorption and Emission