A clinical comparative analysis between expanded NIHSS and original NIHSS in posterior circulation ischemic stroke

The NIHSS is used routinely but has drawbacks. One of them is its inefficiency in detecting all signs of posterior circulation strokes. Since its declaration as a possible substitute for NIHSS in posterior circulation strokes in 2016; the expanded NIHSS (e-NIHSS) has not been paid much attention. The current study assesses clinically the value of e-NIHSS over NIHSS in posterior circulation strokes as regards the percentage of cases with different/higher scores, the significance of such scoring on management decisions, the weight of baseline e-NIHSS as a prognostic tool on 90 days functional outcome and its cut off value.

The current longitudinal observational study was conducted on 79 cases after formal written consent who presented with posterior circulation strokes and confirmed by brain imaging.

In Comparison to NIHSS; the e-NIHSS score was higher in 36 cases at baseline and in 30 cases on discharge. The e-NIHSS median was two points higher at baseline and 24 h and was one point higher on discharge P < 0.001. A baseline moderate/moderate-severe was more common with e-NIHSS (n 50, 63.3%). In terms of 90 days outcome; a less favorable outcome (>2) was evident in cases with different scoring (e-NIHSS > NIHSS) indicating more sensitivity of e-NIHSS in prognosing 90 days outcome. ROC curve showed 82% sensitivity and 81% specificity with a significant area under the curve (=0.858) on scoring ≥ 8 in e-NIHSS.

e-NIHSS is diagnostically and prognostically relevant tool in posterior circulation strokes and ought to be considered in future guidelines.