Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitors in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Cancer by
Shengqi Fei1,2, Yu Lu3, Jing Chen1
1Department of Gastroenterology Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Background:
PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, the results of several clinical trials are not entirely consistent, and the dominant population of first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer still needs to be precisely determined.
Objective:
This objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant clinical trials.
Method:
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched up to August 1, 2022, for clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. Prespecified subgroups included the following: agent type, PD-L1 expression, and high microsatellite instability.
Results:
This study analyzed 5 RCTs involving 3,355 patients. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the combined immunotherapy group had a significantly higher objective response rate (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55-0.72, p < 0.00001) and prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88, p < 0.00001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.82, p < 0.00001). The combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy prolonged OS in both MSI-H (HR = 0.38, p = 0.002) and MSS (HR = 0.78, p < 0.00001) populations, but there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.02). However, in improving ORR, the benefit of ICI combined with chemotherapy in the MSS group and MSI-H group was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.52). Combination therapy with ICIs was more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging OS in the subgroup with a high CPS, regardless of the CPS cutoff for PD-L1. However, when the cutoff of CPS was 1, the difference between subgroups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12), while the benefit ratio of the MSI-H group was higher when the cutoff was 10 (p = 0.004) than when the cutoff value was 5 (p = 0.002).
Conclusions:
For first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer, an ICI combination strategy is more effective than chemotherapy. The subgroup of patients with a CPS ≥10 has a more significant benefit, and CPS ≥10 has the potential to be used as an accurate marker of the dominant population of immuno-combined therapy.
Insights
First-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes for advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Patients with a high Combined Positive Score (CPS) of 10 or greater show the most benefit from this combination therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Gastrointestinal Cancers
Background:
- Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are approved for first-line treatment of advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
- Clinical trial results are inconsistent, necessitating precise determination of the optimal patient population for first-line immunotherapy.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
- Searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to August 1, 2022, for relevant clinical trials.
- Extracted and pooled hazard ratios and confidence intervals for overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates.
Key Points:
- Combined immunotherapy significantly improved objective response rates (OR=0.63), overall survival (HR=0.82), and progression-free survival (HR=0.75) compared to chemotherapy alone.
- Combination therapy benefited both microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite stable (MSS) populations, with greater OS prolongation in MSI-H.
- Patients with a high Combined Positive Score (CPS) demonstrated enhanced overall survival benefits, suggesting CPS ≥10 as a potential predictive marker.
Conclusions:
- Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer.
- A high CPS (≥10) identifies patients who derive significant benefit from first-line immuno-combined therapy.
- CPS ≥10 may serve as an accurate biomarker for selecting patients for this treatment strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...

