Comparison of three massively parallel sequencing platforms for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping in...

Three MPS platforms are being used in forensic genetic analysis, i.e., MiSeq FGx, Ion S5 XL, and MGISEQ-2000. However, few studies compared their performance. In this study, we sequenced 83 common SNPs of 71 samples using the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit on MiSeq FGx, the Precision ID Identity Panel on Ion S5 XL, and the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit on MGISEQ-2000 and then the performance was compared. Results showed that the MiSeq FGx had the highest sequence quality but the lowest sequencing depth and allele balance. Discordant genotypes were observed at six SNPs, which may be caused by variants at primer binding regions, indel errors, or misalignments. Besides, two kinds of background noises, allele-specific miscalled reads (ASMR) and allele-nonspecific miscalled reads (ANMR), were characterized. MGISEQ-2000 showed the highest level of ASMR while Ion S5 XL had the highest level of ANMR. Site- and genotype-dependent miscalled patterns were observed at several SNPs on Ion S5 XL and MGISEQ-2000, but few on MiSeq FGx. In conclusion, the three MPS platforms perform differently with respect to sequencing quality, sequencing depth, allele balance, concordance, and background noise. These findings may be useful for data comparison, mixture deconvolution, and heteroplasmy analysis in forensic genetics.