Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
[18F]FDG PET/MRI in children suffering from lymphoma: does MRI contrast media make a difference?
Kai Jannusch1, Janna Morawitz1, Bernd Schweiger2
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Objectives:
Evaluate the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on primary and follow-up staging in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma using [18F]FDG PET/MRI to avoid adverse effects and save time and costs during examination.
Methods:
A total of 105 [18F]FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for data evaluation. Two different reading protocols were analyzed by two experienced readers in consensus, including for PET/MRI-1 reading protocol unenhanced T2w and/or T1w imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and [18F]FDG PET imaging and for PET/MRI-2 reading protocol an additional T1w post contrast imaging. Patient-based and region-based evaluation according to the revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Staging System (IPNHLSS) was performed, and a modified standard of reference was applied comprising histopathology and previous and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests.
Results:
In patient-based analysis, PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 both determined a correct IPNHLSS tumor stage in 90/105 (86%) exams. Region-based analysis correctly identified 119/127 (94%) lymphoma-affected regions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 were 94%, 97%, 90%, 99%, 97%, respectively. There were no significant differences between PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2.
Conclusions:
The use of MRI contrast agents in [18F]FDG PET/MRI examinations has no beneficial effect in primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients. Therefore, switching to a contrast agent-free [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered in all pediatric lymphoma patients.
Clinical Relevance Statement:
This study gives a scientific baseline switching to a contrast agent-free [18F]FDG PET/MRI staging in pediatric lymphoma patients. This could avoid side effects of contrast agents and saves time and costs by a faster staging protocol for pediatric patients.
Key Points:
• No additional diagnostic benefit of MRI contrast agents at [18F]FDG PET/MRI examinations of pediatric lymphoma primary and follow-up staging • Highly accurate primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients at MRI contrast-free [18F]FDG PET/MRI.
Insights
Contrast-enhanced MRI offers no additional benefit for staging pediatric lymphoma patients using [18F]FDG PET/MRI. A contrast-free protocol provides accurate staging, potentially reducing side effects, time, and costs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- Accurate staging of pediatric lymphoma is crucial for treatment planning.
- 18F]FDG PET/MRI combines metabolic and anatomical imaging for comprehensive evaluation.
- The role of MRI contrast agents in this combined imaging modality requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of MRI contrast agent application on the accuracy of primary and follow-up staging in pediatric lymphoma patients.
- To determine if a contrast-free [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocol is sufficient for staging.
- To assess the potential for reducing adverse effects, time, and costs associated with contrast agents.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 105 [18F]FDG PET/MRI datasets from pediatric lymphoma patients.
- Comparison of two reading protocols: one unenhanced (PET/MRI-1) and one with contrast enhancement (PET/MRI-2).
- Staging was performed according to the International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Staging System (IPNHLSS), with validation against histopathology and follow-up imaging.
Main Results:
- Both PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 achieved correct staging in 86% of patient-based analyses (90/105).
- Region-based analysis demonstrated high accuracy for both protocols (94%).
- No significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or diagnostic accuracy were observed between the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced protocols.
Conclusions:
- MRI contrast agents do not provide additional diagnostic benefit for primary or follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients using [18F]FDG PET/MRI.
- A contrast-free [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocol is highly accurate for staging pediatric lymphoma.
- Consideration of a contrast-free protocol can improve patient safety and streamline the examination process.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...

