Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Intracoronary physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes
Roberto Scarsini1,2, Matteo Tebaldi3, Francesca Rubino4,5
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. roberto.scarsini@aovr.veneto.it.
Insights
Diabetes mellitus (DM) did not increase the risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) after physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) significantly elevates VOCE risk, particularly when revascularization is deferred.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization is not well-defined.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decisions guided by pressure-wire assessment (FFR/NHPR) are crucial for managing coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the risk of VOCE in patients with and without DM who underwent PCI or had it deferred based on functional assessment.
- To compare VOCE risk between different types of DM (insulin-dependent vs. non-insulin-dependent) in the context of physiology-guided revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry including 2828 patients with 3353 coronary lesions.
- Assessment of VOCE (cardiac death, vessel-related MI, ischemia-driven TVR) at long-term follow-up (23 months).
- Utilized fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR) for functional assessment.
Main Results:
- Overall DM was not associated with increased VOCE risk (aHR 1.18, P=0.276).
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) showed increased VOCE risk in the overall cohort (aHR 1.76, P=0.027) but not after PCI.
- In deferred lesions, IDDM significantly increased VOCE risk (aHR 2.77, P=0.029), while non-insulin-dependent DM (NIDDM) did not (aHR 0.94, P=0.776).
- IDDM significantly modified FFR-based risk stratification (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Diabetes mellitus, overall, does not increase VOCE risk in physiology-guided coronary revascularization.
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) identifies a high-risk phenotype for VOCE.
- Functional assessment and deferral strategies require careful consideration in IDDM patients.
Objective:
The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization is poorly defined. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the risk of VOCE in patients with and without DM in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed or deferred based on pressure-wire functional assessment.
Methods:
This is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of patients evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR). Primary endpoint was a composite of VOCE including cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results:
A large cohort of 2828 patients with 3353 coronary lesions was analysed to assess the risk of VOCE at long-term follow-up (23 [14-36] months). Non-insulin-dependent-DM (NIDDM) was not associated with the primary endpoint in the overall cohort (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.87-1.59, P = 0.276) or in patients with coronary lesions treated with PCI (aHR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.78-2.16, P = 0.314). Conversely, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) demonstrated an increased risk of VOCE in the overall cohort (aHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.91, P = 0.027), but not in coronary lesions undergoing PCI (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.50-3.16, P = 0.621). Importantly, in coronary lesions deferred after functional assessment IDDM (aHR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11-6.93, P = 0.029) but not NIDDM (aHR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.44, P = 0.776) was significantly associated with the risk of VOCE. IDDM caused a significant effect modification of FFR-based risk stratification (P for interaction < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Overall, DM was not associated with an increased risk of VOCE in patients undergoing physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, IDDM represents a phenotype at high risk of VOCE.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction