Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease With Hemodynamic Significance

Takayuki Warisawa1,2,3, Christopher M Cook4,5, Yousif Ahmad6

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (T.W., S.D., Y.J.A.).

Insights

Revascularization significantly improves long-term outcomes for stable left main coronary artery disease (LMD) patients with ischemia. Deferred treatment led to more major adverse cardiac events compared to prompt revascularization.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Left main coronary artery disease (LMD) is often excluded from major trials, leaving outcomes data scarce.
  • Understanding the long-term results of treating significant LMD with ischemia is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare long-term clinical outcomes of revascularization versus deferral in patients with stable, physiologically significant LMD.

Main Methods:

  • An international multicenter registry analyzed stable LMD patients with ischemia (iFR ≤0.89).
  • Patients were divided into revascularization (n=151) and deferral (n=74) groups.
  • Propensity score matching adjusted for baseline characteristics; primary endpoint was MACE (death, MI, ischemia-driven TVR).

Main Results:

  • At 2.8 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 14.9% of revascularized vs. 28.4% of deferred patients (HR 0.42, P=0.023).
  • Cardiac death/MI was lower in the revascularized group (0.0% vs. 8.1%, P=0.004).
  • Ischemia-driven LMTVR was significantly lower post-revascularization (5.4% vs. 17.6%, HR 0.20, P=0.012).

Conclusions:

  • Revascularization significantly improves long-term clinical outcomes in stable LMD patients with significant ischemia.
  • Deferred treatment for significant LMD carries a higher risk of adverse cardiac events.
Abstract