Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Classification based on event in survival machine learning analysis of cardiovascular disease cohort
Shokh Mukhtar Ahmad1,2, Nawzad Muhammed Ahmed3
1Department of Statistics and Informatics, College of Administration and Economics, Sulaymaniyah University, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq. shokh.mukhtar@komar.edu.iq.
Insights
Supervised learning models effectively predict cardiovascular patient outcomes, even with a cured fraction. Random forest showed the best overall performance in predicting patient survival status.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biostatistics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Cardiovascular diseases pose a significant health burden.
- Predicting patient outcomes is crucial for effective treatment strategies.
- Survival analysis with a cured fraction presents unique modeling challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate supervised learning classification models for predicting outcomes in cardiovascular patients.
- To identify the most effective machine learning algorithm for survival analysis in this cohort.
- To assess the presence and impact of a cured fraction on prediction accuracy.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 919 cardiovascular patients was analyzed over a maximum of 650 days.
- Survival analysis was performed, confirming a significant cured fraction (P < 0.01).
- Various machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, SVM, logistic, and simple regression, were applied for patient status prediction (alive/dead).
Main Results:
- Random Forest demonstrated the highest overall predictive performance with an Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.934.
- Support Vector Machine (SVM) showed a lower False Positive Rate (0.263) for deceased patients.
- Logistic and simple regression models also yielded strong results with AUCs of 0.911 and 0.909, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Supervised learning models are effective for predicting outcomes in cardiovascular patients with a cured fraction.
- Random Forest is a promising method for overall survival prediction, though SVM excels in identifying deceased cases.
- Machine learning offers valuable tools for enhancing patient outcome prediction in clinical cardiology.
Abstract:
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of supervised learning classification models in predicting patient outcomes in a survival analysis problem involving cardiovascular patients with a significant cured fraction. The sample comprised 919 patients (365 females and 554 males) who were referred to Sulaymaniyah Cardiac Hospital and followed up for a maximum of 650 days between 2021 and 2023. During the research period, 162 patients (17.6%) died, and the cure fraction in this cohort was confirmed using the Mahler and Zhu test (P < 0.01). To determine the best patient status prediction procedure, several machine learning classifications were applied. The patients were classified into alive and dead using various machine learning algorithms, with almost similar results based on several indicators. However, random forest was identified as the best method in most indicators, with an Area under ROC of 0.934. The only weakness of this method was its relatively poor performance in correctly diagnosing deceased patients, whereas SVM with FP Rate of 0.263 performed better in this regard. Logistic and simple regression also showed better performance than other methods, with an Area under ROC of 0.911 and 0.909 respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach

