Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

10:42
Oral Biofilm Sampling for Microbiome Analysis in Healthy Children
Published on: December 31, 2017
17.2K
Factors influencing oral microbiome analysis: from saliva sampling methods to next-generation sequencing platforms
Eunsik Bang1, Sujin Oh2, Uijin Ju1
1Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Scientific Reports
|June 21, 2023
Summary
Standardizing saliva collection for oral microbiome analysis is crucial. Mouthwash collection and simple preservation methods are effective and convenient, simplifying sample preparation for researchers.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genomics
Background:
- The oral microbiome's link to systemic diseases is increasingly recognized.
- Lack of standardized saliva sampling hinders comparable microbiome data.
- Variability in collection and preservation methods affects oral microbiome analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate factors influencing oral microbiome data.
- To compare saliva collection (passive drooling vs. mouthwash) and preservation methods (OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, simple collection).
- To assess the impact of these factors on microbiome composition using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Main Methods:
- Saliva samples collected via passive drooling and mouthwash.
- Samples preserved using OMNIgene, DNA/RNA shield, or simple collection.
- Sequencing performed using Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read NGS.
- Analysis of alpha and beta diversity and taxonomic abundances.
Main Results:
- Mouthwash samples showed significantly higher alpha diversity than drooling samples with both NGS types.
- No significant differences in microbial diversity were observed between the three preservation methods.
- Mouthwash collection and simple preservation are effective alternatives.
Conclusions:
- Mouthwash collection and simple saliva preservation are viable, non-inferior methods.
- These convenient and cost-effective approaches can simplify saliva sample preparation.
- Standardization using these methods could benefit clinical and laboratory settings.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
55
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
55
Next-generation Sequencing
91.6K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
91.6K
RNA-seq
10.1K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
10.1K

