Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery and conventional anaesthesia techniques on post-operative recovery in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries: A prospective randomised study.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2026

Same author

Correction: Cross Sectional Study of Vitamin D Levels in Western Rajasthan and Meta-Analysis for Estimation of Vitamin D Levels.

Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB·2025

Same author

Cross Sectional Study of Vitamin D Levels in Western Rajasthan and Meta-Analysis for Estimation of Vitamin D Levels.

Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB·2025

Same author

Success rate and factors affecting stability of infrazygomatic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of orthodontics·2024

Same author

Rationale and design of Dapagliflozin vErsus SacubiTrIl-valsartaN therapY in Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (DESTINY-HF): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial protocol.

BMJ open·2024

Same author

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in adolescents with overweight or obesity with or without type 2 diabetes multimorbidity-a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2024

Same journal

Erratum.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Cytotoxicity Assessment of the Effects of Pre-Orthodontic Trainer Appliances on Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An <i>in vitro</i> Study.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Effect on Bracket Bonding of Polishing with Fluoride-Containing Prophy Paste Before Enamel Pretreatment with Orthophosphoric Acid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Comparison of the Effects of Functional Treatment and Orthognathic Surgery on Hyoid Bone Position Following Mandibular Advancement.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Comparison of Premaxillary Dimensions in Patients with Palatally and Buccally Impacted Maxillary Canines and Those with Normally Erupted Canines: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

A Bibliometric Assessment of the Turkish Journal of Orthodontics after WoS Indexing.

Turkish journal of orthodontics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application

Vinay Kumar Chugh¹, Navleen Kaur Bhatia¹, Dipti Shastri²

¹All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Department of Dentistry, Rajasthan, India.

Turkish Journal of Orthodontics

|June 22, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Smartphone cephalometric analysis using the OneCeph application demonstrates reliable and comparable results to traditional computer software. While accuracy is maintained, the app requires more time for analysis, suggesting potential for clinical integration.

Keywords:

Cephalometrics Dolphin OneCeph Reliabiity

More Related Videos

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones ViMAS: A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

Area of Science:

Orthodontics
Radiology
Medical Imaging Analysis

Background:

Cephalometric analysis is crucial in orthodontics for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Conventional methods rely on computer-based software for image analysis.
Emerging mobile technologies offer potential alternatives for medical imaging analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the reliability of cephalometric analysis using a smartphone application (OneCeph®) versus conventional computer-based imaging software (Dolphin Imaging®).
To assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability for both methods.
To evaluate the time efficiency of the smartphone application compared to the computer software.

Main Methods:

Fifty subjects' pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs were analyzed.
Landmark identification and cephalometric measurements were performed using OneCeph® and Dolphin Imaging® by two independent observers.
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Paired t-tests compared measurement differences and analysis time between the two methods.

Main Results:

Both OneCeph® and Dolphin Imaging® demonstrated good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability (ICC 0.75-1.00) for hard and soft tissue measurements.
No significant differences in measurement accuracy were found between the smartphone application and computer software (p<0.05).
The OneCeph® application required significantly more time for analysis compared to Dolphin Imaging® (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Smartphone-based cephalometric analysis using OneCeph® offers comparable reliability to computer-based software.
The application is suitable for clinical use despite requiring more time for analysis.
This study validates mobile applications as a viable tool in cephalometric analysis.