Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adjunctive use of scanning electron microscopy in bite mark analysis: a three-dimensional study.

T J David

    Journal of Forensic Sciences
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals unique 3D bite mark characteristics, transforming class evidence into individual identifiers. This advanced imaging enhances forensic odontologist capabilities in bite mark analysis.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bogus Allergy Treatment.

    Bristol medico-chirurgical journal (1963)·2017
    Same author

    Correspondence.

    Bristol medico-chirurgical journal (1963)·2017
    Same author

    Cystic Fibrosis in Children and Adults: Supplement to Paediatric Respiratory Reviews.

    Paediatric respiratory reviews·2016
    Same author

    Cystic fibrosis in children and adults: Supplement to Paediatric Respiratory Reviews.

    Paediatric respiratory reviews·2015
    Same author

    Cystic fibrosis in children and adults: supplement to Paediatric Respiratory Reviews.

    Paediatric respiratory reviews·2014
    Same author

    Cystic fibrosis in children and adults: supplement to paediatric respiratory reviews. Preface.

    Paediatric respiratory reviews·2013

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Odontology
    • Materials Science

    Background:

    • Bite mark analysis traditionally relies on two-dimensional features.
    • Many bite marks lack discernible depth, limiting their evidentiary value.
    • Advanced imaging techniques can potentially reveal hidden characteristics.