A Qualitative Investigation to Develop an Adapted Version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for Use in Children Aged 2-4 Years

Kim Dalziel1, Alexander van Heusden2, Janani Sarvananthar2

  • 1Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Health Services group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Insights

Researchers adapted the EQ-5D-Y-3L for children aged 2-4 years, enhancing its relevance and ease of use for assessing health-related quality of life in young children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Health Outcomes Research
  • Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement
  • Instrument Adaptation and Validation

Background:

  • Limited availability of preference-weighted health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) measures for children under five.
  • Young children represent a significant demographic utilizing healthcare services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the appropriateness of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for children aged 2 to 4 years.
  • To co-produce a suitable adaptation of the EQ-5D-Y-3L with parents.

Main Methods:

  • Purposive sampling of parents of children aged 2-4 years at a children's research institute and hospital.
  • Online focus groups with parents of healthy children and children with moderate to severe health conditions.
  • Thematic analysis of transcribed feedback to guide adaptations, followed by piloting and refinement.

Main Results:

  • Parents found the adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L generally acceptable and provided examples illustrating domain relevance across age and health status.
  • Suggested wording changes, such as 'walking about' to 'movement,' improved instrument applicability for this age group.
  • The adapted instrument demonstrated improved relevance and ease of completion for 2-4 year olds.

Conclusions:

  • The adapted EQ-5D-Y-3L shows enhanced relevance and usability for assessing the health-related quality of life in 2-4 year olds.
  • Further research is necessary to rigorously evaluate the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the adapted instrument.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos