Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Profiling Anti-Neu5Gc IgG in Human Sera with a Sialoglycan Microarray Assay
Published on: July 13, 2017
Mid-arm circumference/head circumference ratios for identification of symptomatic LGA, AGA, and SGA newborn infants
Insights
The mid-arm circumference/head circumference (MAC/HC) ratio better predicts metabolic complications in newborns than birth weight. This ratio helps identify infants at risk due to fetal growth disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Fetal Growth Studies
Background:
- Fetal growth disorders, including acceleration and retardation, are linked to metabolic complications.
- Accurate assessment of fetal growth is crucial for identifying at-risk neonates.
- Traditional measures like birth weight have limitations in predicting these complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive accuracy of mid-arm circumference/head circumference (MAC/HC) ratios versus birth weight.
- To determine which measurement better identifies neonates at risk for metabolic complications associated with fetal growth disorders.
Main Methods:
- Study involved 73 neonates.
- Collected mid-arm circumference/head circumference (MAC/HC) ratios and birth weights.
- Compared the sensitivity of MAC/HC ratios and birth weight in identifying symptomatic infants.
Main Results:
- MAC/HC ratio demonstrated higher sensitivity than birth weight.
- MAC/HC distinguished symptomatic large for gestational age (LGA) infants of diabetic mothers from asymptomatic LGA infants.
- MAC/HC identified symptomatic and asymptomatic small for gestational age (SGA) infants and symptomatic appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants.
Conclusions:
- The MAC/HC ratio is a more effective tool than birth weight for assessing metabolic complication risk in newborns.
- MAC/HC aids in identifying neonates with various fetal growth disorders and associated risks.
- This ratio improves the assessment of newborns affected by fetal growth abnormalities.
Abstract:
Mid-arm circumference/head circumference ratios (MAC/HC) and birth weights obtained in 73 neonates were studied to compare which of these growth measurements could more accurately predict risk of metabolic complications resulting from either acceleration or retardation of fetal growth. The MAC/HC ratio was more sensitive than birth weight in distinguishing symptomatic large for gestational age (LGA) infants who were born to diabetic mothers from other LGA infants who were asymptomatic, and symptomatic from asymptomatic small for gestational age infants. In addition, the MAC/HC ratio identified symptomatic appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants born to diabetic mothers and AGA infants with signs and symptoms of growth retardation. The MAC/HC is more useful than birth weight in assessing newborn infants at risk for the metabolic complications associated with fetal growth disorders.

