Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

34.1K
Overview
34.1K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

58.7K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.7K
Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

35.3K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
35.3K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

40.0K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
40.0K
Ecological Disturbance02:26

Ecological Disturbance

17.2K
An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.
17.2K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.3K
Overview
21.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The success of artificial selection for collective composition hinges on initial and target values.

eLife·2025
Same author

Sub-Second Fluctuation between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Modes Distinguishes Diverse Human Brain States.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Distinct decision-making properties underlying the species specificity of group formation of flies.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Evolution of irreversible somatic differentiation.

eLife·2021
Same author

The birth of a bacterial tRNA gene by large-scale, tandem duplication events.

eLife·2020
Same author

Why is cyclic dominance so rare?

eLife·2020
Same journal

Topological dependence of viral mutation spread in complex host-interaction networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Multifractal signatures of Hamiltonian chaos in Hyperion's rotational dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Exploring mechanisms for reversal of flow in tunicate hearts.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

State estimation in spatiotemporal chaos via low-rank StatFEM.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Universal response functions in driven dissipative tunneling dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

A network-based approach to characterize the dynamics of the coupling field of thermoacoustic oscillators in annular geometry.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.1K

Invasion and interaction determine population composition in an open evolving ecological system.

Youngjai Park1,2,3,4, Takashi Shimada5,6, Seung-Woo Son2,3,7

  • 1Department of Physics, Inha University, Incheon 22212, South Korea.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|June 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Species interactions shape ecosystems, but invasions alter these dynamics. Frequent invasions can increase species diversity and alter community composition, even with strong interactions.

More Related Videos

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

18.9K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

11.1K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

18.9K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Theoretical Ecology
  • Population Dynamics

Background:

  • Species interactions are key drivers of ecosystem population composition.
  • Traditional ecological studies often assume fixed interaction structures.
  • Invasions introduce temporal changes, impacting community dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of invasion on population composition within interacting species.
  • To explore the interplay between invasion dynamics and species interactions in open ecological systems.
  • To analyze community structure under generalized Lotka-Volterra dynamics with invasions.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling open evolving ecological systems.
  • Utilizing generalized Lotka-Volterra-type dynamics.
  • Analyzing system behavior under varying invasion frequencies and interaction strengths.

Main Results:

  • Identified two distinct ecological regimes based on invasion and interaction strength.
  • Strong interactions with slow invasions lead to low diversity and abrupt dominance shifts.
  • Frequent invasions promote higher diversity and slow abundance changes, preventing equilibrium.

Conclusions:

  • Invasion dynamics significantly alter community composition and diversity.
  • The balance between invasion rate and interaction strength dictates ecological regime shifts.
  • Understanding invasion impacts is crucial for predicting ecosystem stability and diversity.