Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
Published on: September 20, 2024
What should be done and what should be avoided when comparing two treatments?
Florie Brion Bouvier1, Raphaël Porcher2
1Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), F-75004, Paris, France.
Abstract:
The preferred approach to compare two treatments is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Indeed, randomization ensures that the groups compared are similar. Well-designed and well-conducted RCTs thus allow to draw causal conclusions on the relative efficacy and safety of treatments compared. However, it is not always possible to conduct RCTs for all clinical questions of interest, and observational data may also be used to infer on the relative effectiveness of treatments. In this review, we present different approaches that allow statistically valid comparisons of the effectiveness of treatments using observational data under some assumptions. Those are based on regression modelling or the propensity score. We also present the principles of target trial emulation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Group Design
Blind Procedures
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...

