Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why let people die?

G R Gillett

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Decisions to stop medical care for patients with irreversible brain damage focus on their identity and quality of life. This ethical analysis supports withholding or withdrawing treatment when significant mental recovery is impossible.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The current role of decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury.

    Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2017
    Same author

    Reconsidering the role of decompressive craniectomy for neurological emergencies.

    Journal of critical care·2017
    Same author

    Intensive care unit research ethics and trials on unconscious patients.

    Anaesthesia and intensive care·2015
    Same author

    Letter to the editor: decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma.

    Acta neurochirurgica·2012
    Same author

    Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue.

    Journal of medical ethics·2011
    Same author

    Neurotrauma and the RUB: where tragedy meets ethics and science.

    Journal of medical ethics·2010
    Same journal

    Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Neuroscience
    • Philosophy of Mind

    Background:

    • Irreversible brain damage presents complex ethical challenges regarding patient care.
    • Determining the cessation of medical intervention requires careful consideration of patient status.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the ethical justifications for withholding or discontinuing medical intervention in patients with irreversible brain damage.
    • To explore the concepts of identity, quality of life, and agency in the context of severe neurological impairment.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical principles.
    • Examination of legal and medical standards for end-of-life care.
    • Case study review (implied).

    Main Results:

    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Ethical justification for discontinuing care is rooted in the irreversible loss of significant mental life.
    • Patient identity, quality of life, and agency are central to the decision-making process.
    • The concept of 'personhood' is critically evaluated in relation to severe brain injury.

    Conclusions:

    • Withholding or withdrawing medical intervention is ethically permissible for patients with irreversible brain damage.
    • Decisions must be grounded in respect for the individual's past and potential future personhood.
    • This framework supports compassionate and ethically sound end-of-life care decisions.