Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Interprofessional care for coronary artery disease includes pharmacological therapy and revascularization procedures.Pharmacological therapy for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) aims to manage symptoms, prevent complications, and improve patient outcomes through various classes of medications:Antiplatelet Agents:Aspirin and Clopidogrel: These medications inhibit platelet aggregation, preventing blood clots, which is crucial for avoiding heart attacks and strokes. Doctors often prescribe these...

Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires collaborative and comprehensive management. CKD progresses through stages and can lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) if untreated. Interprofessional collaboration and patient education are crucial, enabling patients to manage their health and improve their quality of life.Diagnostic approach for chronic kidney diseaseThe diagnosis of CKD primarily focuses on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which assesses kidney function by measuring how well...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II

An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care. Here are a few more healthcare professionals.
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Personalised Pathways (PP) in the Medical Curriculum: How Does It Influence Students?

The clinical teacher·2026

Same author

Association of Technology Enhanced Learning Resource Usage With Assessment Results.

The clinical teacher·2025

Same author

How floods impact health systems: a scoping review of Australian research.

BMJ open·2025

Same author

Enhancing digital health literacy in adolescents: evaluation of a co-designed educational app.

BMC public health·2025

Same author

Oral Peanut Immunotherapy With Butyrate Adjuvant (OPIA) in Children: A Randomised, Controlled Trial.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2025

Same author

Improving Paediatric Surgical Teaching and Learning in a Medical Program Through Online Learning.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Learning outcomes from a systematic review workshop series for junior doctors.

Nounu S Patabendige¹, Karen M Scott², Elizabeth H Barnes³

¹The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Internal Medicine Journal

|June 24, 2023

Summary

Hospital doctors gained significant knowledge and skills in conducting systematic reviews through workshops. These skills enhance research capabilities and support evidence-based clinical practice, improving medical literature review.

Keywords:

education research physicians research design systematic review

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

Systematic reviews represent the highest level of evidence in medical research.
Ten-week workshops were conducted for hospital doctors in 2019 and 2020 to train them in systematic review methodology.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze participant feedback from systematic review workshops.
To enhance the teaching of systematic review conduct to clinicians.

Main Methods:

Post-workshop surveys with quantitative and qualitative data were administered.
Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were used for quantitative analysis.
Conceptual content analysis was applied to qualitative feedback.

Main Results:

52% of 81 attendees completed the survey; 69% had no prior systematic review experience.
93% reported increased knowledge and 69% increased ability in conducting systematic reviews.
Senior doctors reported greater gains in writing, publishing, and research application compared to junior doctors.

Conclusions:

Systematic review workshops improved participants' research knowledge, skills, and future research plans.
Skills acquired facilitated literature review in daily clinical work, promoting evidence-based practice.
Participant feedback highlighted suggestions for workshop improvement, including protected teaching time and increased frequency.