Assessment of body composition in pediatric intestinal failure: A comparison study

Dianna Yanchis1,2, Stephanie So1,2,3, Catherine Patterson1,2,3

  • 1Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Insights

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a reliable method for assessing body composition in children with intestinal failure, showing no significant difference compared to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Skinfold measurements, however, differed significantly from DXA.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Nutrition
  • Body Composition Analysis

Background:

  • Assessing body composition is crucial for managing pediatric intestinal failure.
  • Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard but may not be practical for frequent monitoring.
  • Exploring alternative methods like bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfolds is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold measurements against dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for body composition assessment in children with intestinal failure.
  • To evaluate the clinical utility of BIA and skinfolds as accessible alternatives to DXA.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 68 children (aged 1-18 years) with intestinal failure undergoing routine DXA scans.
  • Body composition parameters, including fat mass (%FM) and fat-free mass (%FFM), were measured using BIA and skinfold methods on the same day as DXA.
  • Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis to assess differences and agreement between methods, with marginal linear models examining the influence of age, sex, and feeding method.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were found between BIA and DXA for %FFM and %FM (P=0.26).
  • A mean bias of -0.69% for %FFM was observed between BIA and DXA, influenced by age and sex (P<0.05).
  • Significant differences were detected between skinfold measurements and DXA (P<0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a clinically acceptable tool for assessing body composition in pediatric patients with intestinal failure.
  • Skinfold measurements demonstrated significant discrepancies compared to DXA, suggesting lower reliability in this population.
  • BIA offers a viable, less invasive alternative for routine body composition monitoring in this vulnerable group.
Abstract