Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
Evaluation of non-clinical toxicity studies of COVID-19 vaccines
N K M Schilder1, B Tiesjema2, P T Theunissen2
1Section on Pharmacology, Toxicology and Kinetics, Medicines Evaluation Board, Graadt van Roggenweg 500, 3531AH, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Division of Toxicology, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Einsteinweg 55, 2333CC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
In this study we evaluated the outcomes of non-clinical toxicity studies of various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines produced with different manufacturing technologies, with focus on Repeated Dose Toxicity (RDT) and Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) studies. We found that RDT and DART studies at doses relevant for human treatment showed no adverse effects while remaining observations were expected findings including local reactogenicity, immune response and macroscopic findings at the injection site. We have also reviewed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) nonclinical assessment reports for market authorization. Regardless of utilized vaccine manufacturing technology EMA assessment of the non-clinical studies consisted most frequently of comments related to study design, species selection and missing data. Sponsors have often submitted platform studies (vaccine studies with the same technology/construct but using other antigens) as supplementary data. Animal model-based toxicity testing has shown rather small effects, which have been never serious adverse effects. The translational value to support clinical development is mainly to inflammatory effects, indicative of the primary action of the vaccines. From a 3R perspective supportive platform technology data consisting of previously executed RDT and DART studies from the same platform technology are encouraged to be implemented in the vaccine assessment process.
Insights
Non-clinical toxicity studies for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including Repeated Dose Toxicity (RDT) and Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) studies, revealed no adverse effects at human-relevant doses. Findings primarily included expected local reactions and immune responses, supporting vaccine safety.
Area of Science:
- Vaccinology
- Toxicology
- Immunology
Background:
- Evaluating non-clinical toxicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is crucial for regulatory approval.
- Different manufacturing technologies may influence vaccine safety profiles.
- Repeated Dose Toxicity (RDT) and Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) studies are key components of non-clinical assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate outcomes of non-clinical toxicity studies for various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
- To assess the safety profile of vaccines across different manufacturing technologies.
- To review European Medicines Agency (EMA) non-clinical assessment reports.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of RDT and DART study data for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
- Review of EMA non-clinical assessment reports for market authorization.
- Evaluation of platform studies submitted as supplementary data.
Main Results:
- RDT and DART studies at human-relevant doses showed no adverse effects.
- Observed findings included local reactogenicity, immune response, and injection site reactions.
- EMA assessments frequently focused on study design, species selection, and data completeness, irrespective of vaccine technology.
Conclusions:
- Animal model-based toxicity testing demonstrated minimal, non-serious adverse effects for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
- The translational value lies in understanding inflammatory effects, indicating vaccine action.
- Utilizing existing RDT and DART data from platform technologies is encouraged for vaccine assessment, aligning with the 3Rs principles.
More Related Videos
07:33Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: September 28, 2022
06:26Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
Published on: July 28, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Teratogenicity
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity