Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
Published on: November 12, 2021
Perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendicectomy or open appendicectomy: A meta-analysis.
1Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China.
Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) offers better outcomes for perforated appendicitis (PA) than open appendicectomy (OA), including reduced wound infections and shorter hospital stays. Further research is needed to confirm these benefits in larger randomized trials.
Area of Science:
- General Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Perforated appendicitis (PA) is a serious condition requiring prompt surgical intervention.
- Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) are common surgical approaches.
- Comparative effectiveness of LA versus OA for PA requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) versus open appendicectomy (OA) in adult patients with perforated appendicitis (PA).
- To systematically review and meta-analyze existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of both surgical techniques for PA.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to January 2022.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing LA and OA for PA, with data extraction and quality assessment performed by two independent investigators.
- Dichotomous outcomes (e.g., intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, complications) were analyzed using odds ratios (OR), and continuous outcomes (e.g., operative time, hospital stay) using weighted mean difference (WMD).
Main Results:
- The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled trials and 12 case-control studies.
- While intra-abdominal abscess rates were similar between LA and OA groups (OR: 1.28), LA demonstrated a significantly lower wound infection rate (OR: 0.38).
- Laparoscopic appendicectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (WMD: -1.43 days) and fewer overall complications compared to open appendicectomy (OR: 0.40).
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic appendicectomy presents significant advantages for treating perforated appendicitis, leading to improved post-operative outcomes.
- Key benefits include a reduced incidence of wound infections, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.
- Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are warranted to definitively establish the clinical benefits of LA for PA.
More Related Videos
10:04Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video
Published on: June 6, 2020
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...