Graphical and numerical diagnostic tools to assess multiple imputation models by posterior predictive checking
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Mingyang Cai1, Stef van Buuren1, Gerko Vink1
1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Problem:
The congenial of the imputation model is crucial for valid statistical inferences. Hence, it is important to develop methodologies for diagnosing imputation models.
Aim:
We propose and evaluate a new diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking to diagnose the congeniality of fully conditional imputation models. Our method applies to multiple imputation by chained equations, which is widely used in statistical software.
Methods:
The proposed method compares the observed data with their replicates generated under the corresponding posterior predictive distributions to diagnose the performance of imputation models. The method applies to various imputation models, including parametric and semi-parametric approaches and continuous and discrete incomplete variables. We studied the validity of the method through simulation and application.
Results:
The proposed diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking demonstrates its validity in assessing the performance of imputation models. The method can diagnose the consistency of imputation models with the substantive model and can be applied to a broad range of research contexts.
Conclusion:
The diagnostic method based on posterior predictive checking provides a valuable tool for researchers who use fully conditional specification to handle missing data. By assessing the performance of imputation models, our method can help researchers improve the accuracy and reliability of their analyzes. Furthermore, our method applies to different imputation models. Hence, it is a versatile and valuable tool for researchers identifying plausible imputation models.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

