Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Comparison of Different Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Predicting Clinical Outcomes with Syntax Score in Patients
Hong Li1, Shuai Meng2, Weiguang Chen3
1Emergency & Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Background:
The clinical value of the Syntax score in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has been well established. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)-albumin ratio (hsCAR), and systemic immune-inflammatory (SII) index are promising systemic inflammation (SI) biomarkers in coronary artery diseases. However, studies which compare the predicting value of these SI indicators with the Syntax score in NSTEMI patients are limited.
Material And Methods:
NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) in our department were retrospectively enrolled. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical value between SI biomarkers and Syntax score in these patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to compare the clinical values of these parameters in predicting 6-month major cardiovascular events (MACE) and over-all mortality.
Results:
A total of 429 NSTEMI patients were finally enrolled in this study. The level of NLR, PLR, as well as hsCAR, and SII in patients with high Syntax scores, are significantly higher than patients with the low Syntax score. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all of the SI indicators but not the Syntax score were the independent risk factors of 6-month MACE in NSTEMI patients. ROC showed that all of the SI indicators had better predictive value than the Syntax score in these patients (0.637, 0.592, 0.631, 0.590, 0.559, respectively) in predicting MACE and similar predictive value in over-all mortality (0.530, 0.524, 0.761, 0.553, 0.620, respectively).
Conclusion:
Novel SI biomarkers including NLR, PLR, hsCAR, and SII have better predictive value in MACE and similar predictive value in over-all mortality compared with Syntax score in NSTEMI patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...

