Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Importance of Tissue Doppler Evaluation in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: The Value of Diastolic Filling Pattern as a
Luminita Iliuță1,2, Andreea Gabriella Andronesi3,4, Marius Rac-Albu1,2
1Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Insights
Restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) significantly worsens prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. This pattern is the best predictor of poor outcomes, increasing mortality and hospitalizations at 1 and 5 years.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Prognostics
Background:
- Restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) is linked to poor outcomes in cardiac diseases.
- Limited data exist on LVDFP's prognostic value in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify key prognostic predictors in DCM patients at 1 and 5 years.
- To assess the impact of restrictive LVDFP on morbidity and mortality in DCM.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 143 DCM patients, categorized into non-restrictive (95) and restrictive (47) LVDFP groups.
- Evaluations included 1 and 5-year follow-ups using in-person visits and hybrid methods (teleconsultation, telemedicine).
- Statistical analysis compared NYHA class, quality of life, heart failure hospitalizations, and mortality between groups.
Main Results:
- The restrictive LVDFP group showed significantly higher mortality rates at 1 year (17.02% vs. 10.59%) and 5 years (68.08% vs. 50.53%).
- Restrictive LVDFP patients had more hospitalizations/ED visits for HF decompensation (85.11% vs. 57.89%) and ventricular arrhythmias.
- Favorable outcomes (NYHA class, quality of life) were more frequent in the non-restrictive LVDFP group.
Conclusions:
- Restrictive LVDFP is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in DCM patients at both 1 and 5 years.
- It is the strongest clinical predictor of unfavorable evolution, even after adjusting for other known DCM risk factors.
Abstract:
(1) Background: The presence of restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in many cardiac diseases, but few data are available on the prognostic implications of this pattern in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We aimed to establish the main prognostic predictors at the 1- and 5-year follow-ups in DCM patients and the value of restrictive LVDFP in increasing morbidity and mortality. (2) Methods: A prospective study of 143 patients with DCM divided in non-restrictive LVDFP group (95 patients) and restrictive group (47 patients). The patients were evaluated at a 5-year follow-up through an in-patient visit during the pre-pandemic period and hybrid methods (face-to-face, teleconsultation and home monitoring with a telemedicine application) during the pandemic period. Statistical analysis compared the two groups in terms of NYHA class, quality of life, hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits due to HF exacerbation and total mortality. (3) Results: The mortality rate in the restrictive group was markedly higher than that in the non-restrictive group at 1 year (17.02% vs. 10.59%, respectively, p < 0.05) and at 5 years (68.08% vs. 50.53%, p < 0.05). In the restrictive group, hospitalizations/ED visits due to HF decompensations at 1 year were significantly higher (85.11% vs. 57.89%, p < 0.05), with hospitalizations for ventricular arrhythmia being almost three times higher (21.28% vs. 7.37%, respectively, p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with a favorable evolution (in terms of NYHA class and quality of life) at the 1- and 5-year follow-ups were higher in the non-restrictive LVDFP group. The main prognostic predictors in patients with DCM at the 1-year follow-up were: restrictive LVDFP, age > 75 years, markedly dilated LV, comorbidities (DM, COPD), 2nd-degree mitral regurgitation and severe pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: At the 1- and 5-year follow-ups, the presence of the restrictive LVDFP in DCM patients was independently associated with a poor prognosis, being the best clinical predictor for unfavorable evolution, after adjustment for other well-established predictive parameters in DCM patients.
More Related Videos
11:04Quantification of Global Diastolic Function by Kinematic Modeling-based Analysis of Transmitral Flow via the Parametrized Diastolic Filling Formalism
Published on: September 1, 2014
10:33Assessment of Right Ventricular Structure and Function in Mouse Model of Pulmonary Artery Constriction by Transthoracic Echocardiography
Published on: February 3, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests