Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

A Model of Glaucoma Induced by Circumlimbal Suture in Rats and Mice
Published on: October 5, 2018
Comparison of 3D heads-up display system with conventional surgical microscopy for minimally invasive glaucoma
Jordan J Huang1, Derek Waldner2, Jaxon J Huang3
1Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Objective:
To survey ophthalmic surgeons' opinions comparing a novel three-dimensional (3D) heads-up display system with a conventional surgical microscopy for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) on an artificial eye model.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-one ophthalmologists at the 2021 Canadian Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia, underwent a 90-minute skills-transfer course on MIGS. Using an artificial eye model (SimulEYE iTrack Model; InsEYE LLC, Westlake Village, Calif.), participants engaged in hands-on practice of MIGS via both a 3D heads-up display system (3D HUDS) (Zeiss Artevo 800; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and a conventional surgical microscope. Following completion, participants and instructors answered a 16-question survey comparing the 2 systems (3D HUDS vs conventional surgical microscope). Survey responses were recorded on a 9-point double-headed Likert scale ranging from strongly favour 3D HUDS (1) to strongly favour conventional surgical microscopy (9). Mann-Whitney U nonparametric analysis was used to compare instructor versus participants and experts versus nonexperts.
Results:
Survey ratings favoured the 3D HUDS over the conventional surgical microscopy, with respondent ratings for all survey questions ranging from a response of 1 (strongly favour 3D HUDS) to 5 (equal). Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between instructor versus participant as well as between expert versus nonexpert. Most ratings for the 3D HUDS were received for ergonomic setup of the surgical modality, depth of field (or) field of view, and usefulness in training residents for MIGS. Equal ratings for the 3D HUDS and conventional surgical microscope were received for system malfunctions and lag during surgery.
Conclusions:
The 3D HUDS was favoured over conventional microscopy for the performance of simulated MIGS by ophthalmologists with varying levels of experience. The survey results suggest that the 3D HUDS in an artificial eye model is useful for teaching minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, particularly with the advent of competency-based ophthalmology education programs.
More Related Videos
10:10Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
Published on: February 15, 2022
08:55Translaminar Autonomous System Model for the Modulation of Intraocular and Intracranial Pressure in Human Donor Posterior Segments
Published on: April 24, 2020