Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics-Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary
Miłosz Starczyński1, Stanisław Dudek1, Piotr Baruś1
1First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str., 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Insights
Assessing coronary artery disease (CAD) requires reliable stenosis evaluation. This review covers invasive imaging like optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), alongside advanced functional measures for improved CAD management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading global cause of mortality.
- Accurate assessment of coronary stenosis is crucial for effective CAD management.
- Current diagnostic modalities for CAD face limitations in imaging and functional assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current invasive functional and intracoronary imaging assessments for coronary stenosis.
- To highlight novel angiography-based and hybrid approaches for CAD evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on invasive functional and intracoronary imaging techniques.
- Summary of established methods like fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR).
- Discussion of emerging techniques including optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), quantitative flow ratio (QFR), FFR-CT, and computational fluid dynamics.
Main Results:
- Invasive functional assessments like FFR and iFR are established tools.
- Intracoronary imaging modalities such as OCT and IVUS provide detailed anatomical information.
- Novel angiography-based measures (QFR, vFFR, FFRangio, FFR-CT) and hybrid approaches offer promising alternatives for stenosis assessment.
Conclusions:
- Accurate stenosis assessment is vital for managing coronary artery disease.
- A range of invasive functional and imaging techniques are available, each with strengths and limitations.
- Emerging non-invasive and hybrid methods show potential to overcome current diagnostic challenges in CAD.
Abstract:
Today, coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a prominent cause of death worldwide. A reliable assessment of coronary stenosis represents a prerequisite for the appropriate management of CAD. Nevertheless, there are still major challenges pertaining to some limitations of current imaging and functional diagnostic modalities. The present review summarizes the current data on invasive functional and intracoronary imaging assessment using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Amongst the functional parameters-on top of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)-we point to novel angiography-based measures such as quantitative flow ratio (QFR), vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR), angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRangio), and computed tomography-derived flow fractional reserve (FFR-CT), as well as hybrid approaches focusing on optical flow ratio (OFR), computational fluid dynamics and attempts to quantify the forces exaggerated by blood on the coronary plaque and vessel wall.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

