Uncovering Knowledge Gaps in the Safety Profile of Antiangiogenic Drugs in Cancer Patients: Insights from Spontaneous

Valerio Ciccone1, Marina Ziche2, Andrea Spini2,3

  • 1Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Insights

This review highlights safety gaps in antiangiogenic drugs (AADs) for cancer. Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) and pericardial disease signals were often unmentioned in drug labels, indicating a need for better postmarketing surveillance.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety
  • Oncology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine

Background:

  • Postmarketing safety reports reveal real-world drug toxicities beyond clinical trials.
  • Antiangiogenic drugs (AADs) are used in cancer treatment, but their real-world safety profiles require continuous monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To map evidence from spontaneous reporting systems studies (SRSs) on AADs in cancer patients.
  • To identify if reported adverse events (AEs) disproportionality signals were validated and included in Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs).

Main Methods:

  • Scoping review conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Focused on spontaneous reporting systems studies (SRSs) of antiangiogenic drugs (AADs).
  • Analyzed findings for validation and mention in drug SmPCs.

Main Results:

  • Identified a knowledge gap regarding AAD safety.
  • Several cardiovascular AEs were not listed in SmPCs, despite known cardiovascular risks.
  • A disproportionality signal for pericardial disease with axitinib was noted but not validated or mentioned in its SmPC.

Conclusions:

  • AADs present unaddressed cardiovascular safety concerns.
  • Unvalidated safety signals, like pericardial disease for axitinib, require further investigation.
  • This review offers a novel approach to identify drug safety concerns and guide postmarketing surveillance for AADs.