Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation
Langping Zhou1, Xiangming Hu1,2, Haotian Zhang1
1Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
Atorvastatin improved coronary microcirculatory perfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), unlike rosuvastatin. This suggests atorvastatin may be more effective for this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Dysfunctional coronary circulation is a concern in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
- Limited evidence exists on the comparative effects of different statins on coronary microcirculation in these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of atorvastatin versus rosuvastatin in improving dysfunctional coronary circulation in STEMI patients post-pPCI.
- To evaluate the impact of statin therapy on coronary microvascular function.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 597 STEMI patients who underwent pPCI.
- Dysfunctional coronary circulation assessed using Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade and TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade (TMPG).
- Logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of statin type on coronary microcirculation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in TIMI no/slow reflow between atorvastatin and rosuvastatin groups.
- Significantly lower incidence of TMPG no/slow reflow with atorvastatin (44.58%) compared to rosuvastatin (57.69%).
- Rosuvastatin was associated with increased odds of TMPG no/slow reflow (OR 1.72-1.73). No difference in clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Atorvastatin demonstrates superior outcomes in improving coronary microcirculatory perfusion compared to rosuvastatin in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
- These findings highlight potential differences in statin effects on microvascular function post-MI.
Objective:
Evidence of therapy for dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is limited. This study was performed to compare the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation.
Methods:
This retrospective study enrolled 597 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI in 3 centers from June 2016 to December 2019. Dysfunctional coronary circulation was defined by the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade and the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of different statin types on dysfunctional coronary circulation.
Results:
The incidence of TIMI no/slow reflow did not differ between the two groups, but the incidence of TMPG no/slow reflow was significantly lower in the atorvastatin than rosuvastatin group (44.58% vs. 57.69%, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval of rosuvastatin was 1.72 (1.17-2.52) for after pretreatment TMPG no/slow reflow and 1.73 (1.16-2.58) for after stenting TMPG no/slow reflow. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes during hospitalization.
Conclusions:
Compared with rosuvastatin, atorvastatin was associated with better coronary microcirculatory perfusion in patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

