Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
The Readiness of ChatGPT to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently: A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and
Maryam Buholayka1,2, Rama Zouabi1, Aditya Tadinada1
1Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, USA.
Abstract:
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific publishing has gained increased attention, and one AI tool that has been the subject of much discussion is ChatGPT. It is a large language model (LLM) built on the OpenAI platform that aims to emulate human-like writing and continually improves through user interactions. In this paper, ChatGPT's performance was assessed in medical publishing by comparing it to a case report written by oral and maxillofacial radiologists. ChatGPT was tasked with writing a case report based on a drafted report written by the authors in five different prompts. The findings of this study highlight issues related to the accuracy, completeness, and readability of the generated text. These results have significant implications for the future use of AI in scientific publishing and suggest that in the current iteration of ChatGPT, scientific information must be revised by an expert.
More Related Videos
07:50A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
