Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Risk prediction in patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing surgical intervention
Fernanda Castiglioni Tessari1, Maria Antonieta Albanez A de M Lopes1,2, Carlos M Campos1,3
1Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
In patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), a mean transaortic gradient of 25 mmHg or less is the primary predictor of mortality. Left ventricular flow reserve does not impact long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Background:
- Classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) presents a poor prognosis and high mortality risk with current treatments.
- There is a need for reliable risk assessment tools for LFLG-AS patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify mortality predictors in patients with classical LFLG-AS undergoing SAVR.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of mean transaortic gradient and flow reserve in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 41 LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR.
- Utilized dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 3D echocardiography, and T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
- Excluded patients with pseudo-severe aortic stenosis; analyzed mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year.
Main Results:
- The mean transaortic gradient was the sole independent predictor of mortality (HR: 0.923, p=0.019).
- A mean transaortic gradient ≤25 mmHg was associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality (log-rank p=0.038).
- Left ventricular flow reserve (FR) status did not show a significant difference in mortality (log-rank p=0.114).
Conclusions:
- The mean transaortic gradient is a critical independent predictor of mortality in LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR.
- A mean transaortic gradient ≤25 mmHg identifies a high-risk subgroup requiring closer monitoring or alternative treatment strategies.
- Left ventricular flow reserve is not a reliable prognostic indicator for long-term outcomes in this cohort.
Introduction:
Classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) is an advanced stage of aortic stenosis, which has a poor prognosis with medical treatment and a high operative mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). There is currently a paucity of information regarding the current prognosis of classical LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR and the lack of a reliable risk assessment tool for this particular subset of AS patients. The present study aims to assess mortality predictors in a population of classical LFLG-AS patients undergoing SAVR.
Methods:
This is a prospective study including 41 consecutive classical LFLG-AS patients (aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2, mean transaortic gradient <40 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). All patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 3D echocardiography, and T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Patients with pseudo-severe aortic stenosis were excluded. Patients were divided into groups according to the median value of the mean transaortic gradient (≤25 and >25 mmHg). All-cause, intraprocedural, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates were evaluated.
Results:
All of the patients had degenerative aortic stenosis, with a median age of 66 (60-73) years; most of the patients were men (83%). The median EuroSCORE II was 2.19% (1.5%-4.78%), and the median STS was 2.19% (1.6%-3.99%). On DSE, 73.2% had flow reserve (FR), i.e., an increase in stroke volume ≥20% during DSE, with no significant differences between groups. On CMR, late gadolinium enhancement mass was lower in the group with mean transaortic gradient >25 mmHg [2.0 (0.0-8.9) g vs. 8.5 (2.3-15.0) g; p = 0.034), and myocardium extracellular volume (ECV) and indexed ECV were similar between groups. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 14.6% and 43.8%, respectively. The median follow-up was 4.1 (0.3-5.1) years. By multivariate analysis adjusted for FR, only the mean transaortic gradient was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 0.923, 95% confidence interval: 0.864-0.986, p = 0.019). A mean transaortic gradient ≤25 mmHg was associated with higher all-cause mortality rates (log-rank p = 0.038), while there was no difference in mortality regarding FR status (log-rank p = 0.114).
Conclusions:
In patients with classical LFLG-AS undergoing SAVR, the mean transaortic gradient was the only independent mortality predictor in patients with LFLG-AS, especially if ≤25 mmHg. The absence of left ventricular FR had no prognostic impact on long-term outcomes.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction