Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

233
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
233
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

187
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
187
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

72
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
72

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lessons Learned from Air Quality Assessments in Communities Living near Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025
Same author

DEET Metabolite and Hearing Loss in United States Adults.

Toxics·2025
Same author

Investigation of Lead and Chromium Exposure After Consumption of Contaminated Cinnamon-Containing Applesauce - United States, November 2023-April 2024.

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report·2025
Same author

Hearing Loss and Urinary <i>trans</i>,<i>trans</i>-Muconic Acid (<i>t</i>,<i>t</i>-MA) in 6- to 19-Year-Old Participants of NHANES 2017-March 2020.

Toxics·2024
Same author

Worker studies suggest unique liver carcinogenicity potential of polyvinyl chloride microplastics.

American journal of industrial medicine·2023
Same author

Perfluoroalkyl acids, hyperuricemia and gout in adults: Analyses of NHANES 2009-2014.

Chemosphere·2020
Same journal

Effects of Chlorpyrifos or Methyl Parathion on Regional Cholinesterase Activity and Muscarinic Receptor Subtype Binding in Juvenile Rat Brain.

Journal of toxicology and pharmacology·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

12.5K

Evaluation of ATSDR's MRL and EPA's RfCs/RfDs: Similarities, Differences, and Rationales.

Jennifer Przybyla1, Melanie C Buser1, Henry G Abadin1

  • 1Office of Innovations and Analytics. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Journal of Toxicology and Pharmacology
|June 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Government agencies derive health guidance values (HGVs) like minimal risk levels (MRLs) and reference concentrations/doses (RfCs/RfDs) for environmental contaminants. Differences in HGVs arise from varied methodologies, studies, or updated evaluations, impacting risk assessment.

Keywords:
ATSDRAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease RegistryEPAEnvironmental Protection AgencyMRLsMinimal Risk LevelsReference ConcentrationReference DoseRfCRfDcomparisonderivation

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K
Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

12.5K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K
Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establish health guidance values (HGVs) to assess risks from environmental contaminants.
  • Minimal risk levels (MRLs), reference concentrations (RfCs), and reference doses (RfDs) are derived using similar methods but can yield different values for the same chemical.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare MRLs, RfCs, and RfDs.
  • To qualitatively identify factors influencing HGV development.
  • To explore collaborations for coordinating HGV efforts.

Main Methods:

  • Collected MRLs, RfCs/RfDs, assessment dates, and derivation details from ATSDR and EPA databases (IRIS, OPP).
  • Identified and analyzed reasons for discrepancies between MRLs and RfCs/RfDs.

Main Results:

  • Frequent differences in HGVs stem from distinct methodologies, use of different studies, or more recent chemical evaluations.
  • Divergent values can be attributed to variations in scientific judgment.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding differences in HGVs is crucial for accurate risk characterization and communication.
  • Improved coordination between agencies can enhance consistency in health guidance values.