Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Bridging the Gap between Differential Mobility, Log S, and Log P Using Machine Learning and SHAP Analysis.
Cailum M K Stienstra1, Christian Ieritano1, Alexander Haack1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
Machine learning models trained with differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) data accurately predict drug properties like aqueous solubility (log S) and hydrophobicity (log P). This approach offers a valuable alternative to purely structure-based models for drug candidate screening.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry and Cheminformatics
- Analytical Chemistry
- Machine Learning in Chemical Sciences
Background:
- Aqueous solubility (log S) and water-octanol partition coefficient (log P) are critical physicochemical properties for drug development and environmental fate assessment.
- Accurate prediction of these properties is essential for efficient screening of drug candidates and understanding chemical transport.
- Existing methods often rely on large datasets or purely structure-based models, which can have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) frameworks for predicting aqueous solubility (log S) and hydrophobicity (log P) using differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) data.
- To assess the explainability of the ML models using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.
- To compare the performance of DMS-based models with and without additional structural descriptors.
Main Methods:
- Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) experiments were conducted in microsolvating environments to generate ion mobility/DMS data (e.g., collision cross-section, dispersion curves).
- Machine learning regressors and ensemble stacking were employed to build predictive models for log S and log P.
- The OPERA package was used to obtain reference log S and log P values for 333 analytes, and SHAP analysis was used for model interpretability.
Main Results:
- DMS-based regression models achieved R² = 0.67 for both log S and log P predictions with RMSE values of 1.03 ± 0.10 and 1.20 ± 0.10, respectively.
- SHAP analysis indicated that gas-phase clustering was a significant factor in log P predictions.
- Incorporating structural descriptors improved model performance, yielding RMSE = 0.84 and R² = 0.78 for log S, and RMSE = 0.83 and R² = 0.84 for log P.
Conclusions:
- Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) data, when used with machine learning, provides a valuable and explainable approach for predicting key physicochemical properties like log S and log P.
- The inclusion of structural descriptors further enhances prediction accuracy, demonstrating a synergistic effect.
- This DMS-driven methodology offers a promising alternative to traditional structure-based models, especially when dealing with smaller datasets.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Regression Toward the Mean
Outliers and Influential Points

